Re: Possible WM Documentation Project
Russ Button <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jess Anderson wrote: >The usual course of inaction is to wait for someone else to do >it, with predicatble results, namely none. For a different >outcome, one person must do it alone or a small group (at >least 3, not more than 5) must do it as a cooperative venture. > > I think that one person needs to spearhead the effort and break the project into small enough pieces that a person could work one piece at a time. So I'm willing to put in some effort here. If the doc lead were to hand me a piece, I'd work it, and then the doc lead could review/edit it, and we could go back/forth on it until it looks suitable and gets checked in. Even if you break it into 50 pieces and you have a team of 3, each doing one piece/month, in a years time, you've about got it all done. >* How many people would be served? > > The people that documentation best suits are those who don't know anything about WM and are considering it. If it's too much trouble to figure out how to install/run WM, then they're not going to. If you want the user base to grow beyond The Faithful, then making it easy to install and use is essential. >* How much lifetime *really* remains for WM before its user > base falls below some critical mass and/or its developers > move on to more rewarding endeavors? > > If your user base is limited to people who read source code for the documentation, it won't be long. On the other hand, I'm developing an 'IX desktop product which I have high hopes for and plan to make WM an important feature. So if I have anywhere near the success I expect to have, WM will become very widely known. I dig WM and would help out anyway, but having good WM docs can only help my own project. >I think all viewpoints should be heard and at least one of the >above posters thought we don't need such an effort. If there's >enough feeling to the contrary, I'll offer to contribute and >(absent better alternatives) to coordinate the project, but I >will not do it alone. > > Cool. I'll be happy to help. I'm not an experienced tech writer, but I'll do my best. One of the things I'd like to see are docs relating to all the weird little control files and such. What the GNUstep directory does and all the various control files underneath it. This would really help those trying to integrate WM into some new 'IX variant. I've only installed it in Redhat 6.x, 7.x, 9.x and Fedora Core 2. A lot of the problem I suppose is that it just isn't stuff with WM, but also with the login manager like GDM or XDM. Still I think that the job isn't done until the reader finds everything they need instead of having to reinvent the wheel. I'd also like to see some docs that tell folks how to create themes and such. Maybe it's already there and I haven't found it, or what's there is minimal and needs to be integrated into this larger effort. It would certainly help if everything could be found in one location. Russ _______________________________________________ INFO: https://windowmaker.org/lists/listinfo/wm-user ARCHIVE: https://windowmaker.org/lists/archive/wm-user/ FAQ: http://windowmaker.org/faq.html