Re: Possible WM Documentation Project

Jess Anderson wrote:
> Alex Perez:
> 
> 
>>However, I highly suspect that several of the core WM folks
>>are terminally pissed at me, because of some things I have
>>done in the past, and while I have no personal problems with
>>them, I believe they can't get over their own personal
>>hang-ups and be objective, even if just for the five minutes
>>it would take them to review my patch and actually apply it.
> 
> 
> Excuse me, but this is not the place to be settling old scores,
> so let it go, please.

Whaaa! *hands you a tissue* Excuse me, but when you write a patch and it 
doesn't get applied for what you highly suspect are purely stupid 
political hatreds, I think I have every right to be somewhat ticked 
about it. You have no right to tell me to "get over" it when you have no 
real understanding of what's actually going on. The WM team has revoked 
CVS access from people who actually had cvs commit privelages to the wm2 
branch who were pro-gnustep. They have a very clearly established track 
record of stonewalling and also of completely disappearing for months on 
end and then getting all defensive when people threaten to fork. Since 
they're back to their same old shenanigans, I suspect you can expect to 
see a fork by some other folks of some form here in the next six months.

Alex Perez

_______________________________________________
INFO: https://windowmaker.org/lists/listinfo/wm-user
ARCHIVE: https://windowmaker.org/lists/archive/wm-user/
FAQ: http://windowmaker.org/faq.html