Re: Re: Possible WM Documentation Project

Peter Dembinski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.user
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:26:29PM -0300, Alfredo Kengi Kojima wrote:
> 
> You don't need CVS access to get documentation into releases. 
> Documentation should stay in a separate CVS tree.

If we are talking about versioning system, why not consider other 
alternatives apart of Subversion, such as darcs?  Though it is
written in not-very-human-readable programming language, I heard
this is a powerful system.
_______________________________________________
INFO: https://windowmaker.org/lists/listinfo/wm-user
ARCHIVE: https://windowmaker.org/lists/archive/wm-user/
FAQ: http://windowmaker.org/faq.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.