Re: file manager

Sean <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:12:59 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Wow! TkDesk. Really?
> 
> That was the only workable gui file manager back in 1996, when I started 
> in linux, but I thought it had died about 2000.
> 
> I would bet that anything based on Tk will be somewhat slow and 
> graphically tedious if you are used to something like Windows Explorer.
> 
> It seems to me you should tell us what kind of file manager you like. 
> Unless you give us some hints, then we will keep coming up with more and 
> more programs you can test and waste your time on.
> 
> If you have a linux distro with Gnome, I would seriously suggest using 
> "nautilus" and just turn off its parts that conflict with WindowMaker.
> I can tell you exactly what is required.
> 
> If your linux has KDE, you could use their file manager.  To me, it 
> looks almost exactly like Windows 98.  Maybe that's just my memory 
> fooling me.
> 
> Many of the others people have suggested are OK and do run safely. Top 
> on this list, consider
> xfe
> 
> my favorite among the small file manager projects
> 
> Rox filer is quite nice.
> 
> And the file manager from the XFCE desktop, xffm, works OK too.
> 
> Only "nautilus" and the KDE file manager are likely to cause 
> configuration hassles.
> 
> There are RPMS or DEBs available for all of these, and so installing 
> them and testing should be easy.  Don't let yourself get drawn into the 
> hassle of trying to compile some cutting edge program unless you really 
> know what you are doing.  Quite often, I find myself spending an 
> afternoon compiling prerequisite support libraries and only later find 
> out that a program is still considered too unstable to use.  Any file 
> manager based on the Enlightenment development libraries, for example, 
> falls into that category.  Although you can get RPMS from Didier Case's 
> web site for the Enlightenment snapshots, you should be warned that 
> these are under heavy development.
> 

xfe looks interesting, and I will instead try it. TkDesk is not catching 
my interest.

I am not running Windowmaker on Linux, I am on FreeBSD. I tried Gnome in 
  the early days, and used it for a while, but I did not like the way it 
and Nautilus moved over time.

Tried a few others, including Enlightenment and Xfce. Enlightenment is 
interesting, including 17, but as you mentioned is always under heavy 
development, a big moving target. Needs to settle a bit.
Xfce is nice and stable, but I wanted something else.
Played with KDE a long while, still like it, but wanted to try something 
different and after looking around, Windowmaker caught my attention.
I do like Konqueror as a file manager, but I do not want all else that 
has to come with it, just to use it.

So as mentioned above the xfe manager looks interesting, lite, and I 
will give it a try.

			Thanks
			Sean
_______________________________________________
INFO: https://windowmaker.org/lists/listinfo/wm-user
ARCHIVE: https://windowmaker.org/lists/archive/wm-user/
FAQ: http://windowmaker.org/faq.html