Re: file manager
Sean <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:12:59 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Johnson wrote: > Wow! TkDesk. Really? > > That was the only workable gui file manager back in 1996, when I started > in linux, but I thought it had died about 2000. > > I would bet that anything based on Tk will be somewhat slow and > graphically tedious if you are used to something like Windows Explorer. > > It seems to me you should tell us what kind of file manager you like. > Unless you give us some hints, then we will keep coming up with more and > more programs you can test and waste your time on. > > If you have a linux distro with Gnome, I would seriously suggest using > "nautilus" and just turn off its parts that conflict with WindowMaker. > I can tell you exactly what is required. > > If your linux has KDE, you could use their file manager. To me, it > looks almost exactly like Windows 98. Maybe that's just my memory > fooling me. > > Many of the others people have suggested are OK and do run safely. Top > on this list, consider > xfe > > my favorite among the small file manager projects > > Rox filer is quite nice. > > And the file manager from the XFCE desktop, xffm, works OK too. > > Only "nautilus" and the KDE file manager are likely to cause > configuration hassles. > > There are RPMS or DEBs available for all of these, and so installing > them and testing should be easy. Don't let yourself get drawn into the > hassle of trying to compile some cutting edge program unless you really > know what you are doing. Quite often, I find myself spending an > afternoon compiling prerequisite support libraries and only later find > out that a program is still considered too unstable to use. Any file > manager based on the Enlightenment development libraries, for example, > falls into that category. Although you can get RPMS from Didier Case's > web site for the Enlightenment snapshots, you should be warned that > these are under heavy development. > xfe looks interesting, and I will instead try it. TkDesk is not catching my interest. I am not running Windowmaker on Linux, I am on FreeBSD. I tried Gnome in the early days, and used it for a while, but I did not like the way it and Nautilus moved over time. Tried a few others, including Enlightenment and Xfce. Enlightenment is interesting, including 17, but as you mentioned is always under heavy development, a big moving target. Needs to settle a bit. Xfce is nice and stable, but I wanted something else. Played with KDE a long while, still like it, but wanted to try something different and after looking around, Windowmaker caught my attention. I do like Konqueror as a file manager, but I do not want all else that has to come with it, just to use it. So as mentioned above the xfe manager looks interesting, lite, and I will give it a try. Thanks Sean _______________________________________________ INFO: https://windowmaker.org/lists/listinfo/wm-user ARCHIVE: https://windowmaker.org/lists/archive/wm-user/ FAQ: http://windowmaker.org/faq.html