Re: the newbie ?

shari <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.backpacking.light
Message-ID <CADVqcM_ARd+bn3TmU4AWb56CWMMGSmLQCO1AUiCanX9EE87OQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Lots of good advice from everyone.  As has been said, the reasons people go
lightweight are varied.  I did it because I was getting older and wanted to
enjoy my hiking as much as possible, as long as possible.  For me, there's
a huge difference in hauling 25 lbs up a mountain as opposed to hauling 50
lbs.

I would add a couple of things to what has already been mentioned.

First, take a look at your first aid kit.  Mine is down to ibuprofin, duct
tape (off the roll), triple antibiotic ointment, a needle in a small sliver
of corrugated cardboard, and super glue.  It weighs about 2 oz, including
the little bag it's all in. I've carried this kit for about 2000 miles now
and it's served me well.  I carry an alcohol stove and use 70% or 90%
isopropyl alcohol, so I've always got the alcohol to use for first aid as
well as cooking.  And I carry a small spool of floss for flossing, which
can also be used for stitches if necessary.

When I first began lightening my gear, a friend who was already lightweight
told me to start by getting my pack, sleeping bag and shelter under 3 lbs
each.  My tarp is 1 lb, my pack is 1.5 lbs, and my sleeping bag is just
under 2 lbs.  The sleeping bag cost me a small fortune, but it will last me
forever, and the rest of my gear was much more reasonable, if not downright
free with a little bit of DIY.  There's a certain amount of satisfaction to
be had from building your own stuff and knowing it weighs a whole lot less
than anything you could buy.


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Don Amundson <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
>
>  Just a couple of my thoughts
>
> The point for me is to carry what I need without feeling what I'm
> carrying. Minimalist isn't part of the equation--I don't carry all that
> much less gear than anyone else. It's just that what I do carry weights
> less. At my age I'm losing the physical ability to and am not interestedin carrying the
> 30-40-50lbs. of the past. If I knew what I know today and the gear was
> available I wouldn't have carried that much in the past either.  Some
> consider lightweight as a sacrifice in comfort and safety but that certainly
> doesn't fit with my experience.  I have shelter from the elements, sleep
> warm on a soft pad in a warm bag and carry my gear in a pack designed for
> the weight.  Just considering those basic elements the weight for a three
> season trip my weight is less than 5lbs. Fully loaded with food for a 3 day
> trip my pack weight is under  10 lbs. I have hot meals, 2 cups of coffee
> each morning, brush my teeth, have reading material for entertainment-all
> the things just about everyone carries.
> It takes time to understand your capabilities and that of your gear.  I do
> believe in one thing though-the more you backpack the less you need. One
> you start taking a serious look at your gear with a focus on lighter
> alternatives, dual use and  elimination of unused items
>  your pack weight will begin to drop.
>
> > To: [email protected]
> > From: bacncheesmurrder88-/[email protected]
> > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 06:48:43 +0000
>
> > Subject: [BackpackingLight] the newbie ?
> >
> > so im new to the whole minimalist, lightweight backpacking scene but am
> no stranger to carrying a heavy pack over long distances, (ARMY.) i guess
> my question is... is the point to see how light you can get, or to see how
> little you can bring?
> > without advise, i myself would bring just what i needed and not anything
> more, not worrying about the weight of it. but i may be missing the point
> of this style backpacking?
>
>
>   
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.