Re: the newbie ?
shari <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.backpacking.light |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADVqcM_ARd+bn3TmU4AWb56CWMMGSmLQCO1AUiCanX9EE87OQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Lots of good advice from everyone. As has been said, the reasons people go lightweight are varied. I did it because I was getting older and wanted to enjoy my hiking as much as possible, as long as possible. For me, there's a huge difference in hauling 25 lbs up a mountain as opposed to hauling 50 lbs. I would add a couple of things to what has already been mentioned. First, take a look at your first aid kit. Mine is down to ibuprofin, duct tape (off the roll), triple antibiotic ointment, a needle in a small sliver of corrugated cardboard, and super glue. It weighs about 2 oz, including the little bag it's all in. I've carried this kit for about 2000 miles now and it's served me well. I carry an alcohol stove and use 70% or 90% isopropyl alcohol, so I've always got the alcohol to use for first aid as well as cooking. And I carry a small spool of floss for flossing, which can also be used for stitches if necessary. When I first began lightening my gear, a friend who was already lightweight told me to start by getting my pack, sleeping bag and shelter under 3 lbs each. My tarp is 1 lb, my pack is 1.5 lbs, and my sleeping bag is just under 2 lbs. The sleeping bag cost me a small fortune, but it will last me forever, and the rest of my gear was much more reasonable, if not downright free with a little bit of DIY. There's a certain amount of satisfaction to be had from building your own stuff and knowing it weighs a whole lot less than anything you could buy. On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Don Amundson <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > > Just a couple of my thoughts > > The point for me is to carry what I need without feeling what I'm > carrying. Minimalist isn't part of the equation--I don't carry all that > much less gear than anyone else. It's just that what I do carry weights > less. At my age I'm losing the physical ability to and am not interestedin carrying the > 30-40-50lbs. of the past. If I knew what I know today and the gear was > available I wouldn't have carried that much in the past either. Some > consider lightweight as a sacrifice in comfort and safety but that certainly > doesn't fit with my experience. I have shelter from the elements, sleep > warm on a soft pad in a warm bag and carry my gear in a pack designed for > the weight. Just considering those basic elements the weight for a three > season trip my weight is less than 5lbs. Fully loaded with food for a 3 day > trip my pack weight is under 10 lbs. I have hot meals, 2 cups of coffee > each morning, brush my teeth, have reading material for entertainment-all > the things just about everyone carries. > It takes time to understand your capabilities and that of your gear. I do > believe in one thing though-the more you backpack the less you need. One > you start taking a serious look at your gear with a focus on lighter > alternatives, dual use and elimination of unused items > your pack weight will begin to drop. > > > To: [email protected] > > From: bacncheesmurrder88-/[email protected] > > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 06:48:43 +0000 > > > Subject: [BackpackingLight] the newbie ? > > > > so im new to the whole minimalist, lightweight backpacking scene but am > no stranger to carrying a heavy pack over long distances, (ARMY.) i guess > my question is... is the point to see how light you can get, or to see how > little you can bring? > > without advise, i myself would bring just what i needed and not anything > more, not worrying about the weight of it. but i may be missing the point > of this style backpacking? > > > >