Re: [Ebbc-Talk] [Discuss] Fwd: Transportation Commission Mtg - Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7 p.m.
John Knox White <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:35:58 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.bicycle.ebbc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+rJi5-5vdQo65i02WmX2dLLoSizQGTxntecGcHsf_w9fZ9JNg@mail.gmail.com> |
The concern you raise is a good one to look at, however I think you may have misread the powerpoint. This study finds that cycletracks (buffered bike lanes) reduce the risk of an accident (Page 23) more than bike lanes. The information you refer to on Pages 40&43 (same data) refer to cyclists in the street, biking against traffic at an intersection (not what is being proposed). Specifically, the study (summarized on page 23) found that cycletracks have the lowest rate of collisions compared to no bike-specific infrastructure, sharrows and bike lanes, which I interpret to mean they are safer than bike lanes and shared lanes. The staff proposal has physical barriers along all sections of the path that do not have 24 hour street parking. As currently parking is at a premium on Shoreline, I'm not sure I share your opinion that long stretches on open parking spaces will be prevalent, but I am confident that the staff proposal, worked out at three very well attended community meetings, has opted for the safest plan possible. _______________________________________________ Ebbc-Talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org