[Ebbc-Talk] Further Evidence That Road Diets Don ’t Hurt Businesses | Streetsblog.net
Len Conly <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:11:31 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.bicycle.ebbc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
http://streetsblog.net/2013/08/13/further-evidence-that-road-diets-dont-hur= t-businesses/ Further Evidence That Road Diets Don=92t Hurt Businesses An analysis of reported sales tax found that business in Seattle was not da= maged when parking was removed on NE 65th Street to make way for bike infra= structure. Image: Seattle Transit Blog It seems inevitable that when a new bike lane or road diet is proposed anyw= here in the United States, business owners fret that a loss of parking will= scare away customers. But as more cities pursue safer streets, more data i= s helping prove the dire predictions wrong. In fact, in many cases we=92ve = seen the opposite: cycling infrastructure seems to actually boost business. Kyle Rowe at Seattle Transit Blog offers a new example today. Rowe examined= taxable retail sales data on two streets where parking was eliminated to m= ake room for cycling infrastructure in Seattle. In the first case, there wa= s no noticeable change in revenue. In the second case, as shown above, sale= s spiked. Rowe explains his findings: The results of this analysis are in the graph above, again with the bicycle= lane signifying the construction of the project and the removal of the par= king. Leading up to the construction and just afterwards NE 65th St perform= ed very similar to both controls, however two quarters after the project wa= s finished NE 65th St experienced a 350% increase in sales index, followed = by another jump to 400% sales index the following quarter. Even though the business district at 65th & Latona experienced a 400% incre= ase in sales index after the project was finished, we cannot assume that th= is economic success was solely because of bicyclists. One could argue that = the economic success likely wasn=92t the product of motorists since their a= ccess was theoretically reduced, but without mode-split data before and aft= er the project no conclusions can be made to assume which mode was most res= ponsible for the economic change. Looking at the data, one conclusion can clearly be made, these bicycle proj= ects did not have a negative impact on the business districts in both case = studies. This conclusion can be made because in both case studies the busin= ess district at the project site performed similarly or better than the con= trols. Elsewhere on the Network today: Stop and Move says Elon Musk=92s much-discu= ssed Hyperloop proposal appears to be either a joke or an attempt to sabota= ge California High-Speed Rail. Human Transit wonders if texting and driving= is pushing people toward transit. And Systemic Failure says a new =93trans= it village=94 planned for a BART station is anything but. _______________________________________________ Ebbc-Talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org