Re: Emotions
Chris Morris <[email protected]> Thu, 06 May 2004 22:18:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.business.resistance-as-a-resource |
|---|---|
| Organization | cLabs.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
gammasync wrote:
>
>I agree. Having a restricted vocabulary for positive emotions makes it
>difficult for us to talk about them.
>
>For example, there are biological differences between lust, attachment
>and affection (see _Why We Love_ Helen Fisher), but we tend to lump
>them all under the word love.
>
>
I believe these things you've mentioned are bigger than just emotions.
They certainly involve emotions, but if I love someone, it affects
things I believe about that person and ways I treat that person, not
just emotions I feel. And in my book, lust usually involves some anger
and lonliness, which are not 'positive' emotions.
--
Chris
http://cministries.org
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/resistance-as-a-resource/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/