RE: czplsk practically found
"Hugh Wallis" <hugh-rh/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00cc01c6a523$9078c4b0$0202fea9@HUGH> |
The stream confluence is approximately equidistant from the CZ and PL obelisks. You can't really tell that from any of the photos but you can if you go there in person. _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of aletheia kallos Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [BoundaryPoint] czplsk practically found if you would look again at this pic of the cz & pl obelisks http://freepages. <http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2103.jpg> misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2103.jpg & realize that the official measurements place the tripoint not much farther down the hill than the 2 obelisks are distant from each other or roughly 27 meters as against 16 then you can practically s e e the legal tripoint position within frame or not very far out of view beneath the curvature of the hill nor would this position even seem to lie among the thicker veggies yet perhaps it is not at all far beyond the last of the signs & poles other views of the area just below the obelisks confirm this overall impression of an open clearing covering most if not all these 27 meters http://www.vasa. <http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk2.jpg> abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk2.jpg http://www.vasa. <http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk1.jpg> abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk1.jpg http://freepages. <http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2099.jpg> misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2099.jpg now correct me if i am wrong but my sense at least of the stream confluence is that it lies in deep woods a good deal farther down the hill than any of these scenes even extend & unless i am mistaken about that then it certainly appears now even without having to wait for winter or any retry that either the stream confluence tripoint positioning or the official measurements of the tripoint positioning must be wrong i can scarcely wait for the next try based on these data tho or else for these measurements to somehow get busted in favor of the confluence position for i agree it still seems a reasonable enough hypothesis had it not been for these pesky data that seem to rule it out but please do amplify the impression or correct any wrong impression in any of this if you can like how far would anyone guess the confluence actually is from the pair of obelisks etc __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail. <http://mail.yahoo.com> yahoo.com