RE: czplsk practically found

thanx

how far would you guess it is from them 

& how far from the sk obelisk

--- Hugh Wallis <hugh-rh/[email protected]> wrote:

> The stream confluence is approximately equidistant
> from the CZ and PL
> obelisks. You can't really tell that from any of the
> photos but you can if
> you go there in person.
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of aletheia kallos
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:43 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] czplsk practically found
> 
> 
> 
> if you would look again at this pic of the cz & pl
> obelisks
> http://freepages.
>
<http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2103.jpg>
> misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2103.jpg
> & realize that the official measurements place the
> tripoint not much farther down the hill than the 2
> obelisks are distant from each other
> or roughly 27 meters as against 16
> then you can practically
> s e e
> the legal tripoint position within frame 
> or not very far out of view beneath the curvature of
> the hill 
> 
> nor would this position even seem to lie among the
> thicker veggies yet
> 
> perhaps it is not at all far beyond the last of the
> signs & poles
> 
> other views of the area just below the obelisks
> confirm this overall impression of an open clearing
> covering most if not all these 27 meters
> http://www.vasa.
> <http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk2.jpg>
> abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk2.jpg
> http://www.vasa.
> <http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk1.jpg>
> abo.fi/users/rpalmber/CzPlSk1.jpg
> http://freepages.
>
<http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2099.jpg>
> misc.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/CZPLSK/DSCN2099.jpg
> 
> now correct me if i am wrong but my sense at least
> of
> the stream confluence is that it lies in deep woods
> a
> good deal farther down the hill than any of these
> scenes even extend
> 
> & unless i am mistaken about that 
> then it certainly appears now
> even without having to wait for winter or any retry
> that either the stream confluence tripoint
> positioning
> or the official measurements of the tripoint
> positioning must be wrong
> 
> i can scarcely wait for the next try based on these
> data tho
> 
> or else for these measurements to somehow get busted
> in favor of the confluence position
> for i agree it still seems a reasonable enough
> hypothesis
> had it not been for these pesky data that seem to
> rule
> it out
> 
> but please do amplify the impression or correct any
> wrong impression in any of this if you can
> 
> like how far would anyone guess the confluence
> actually is from the pair of obelisks
> 
> etc
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail. <http://mail.yahoo.com> yahoo.com 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/