Re: SV: yikes kztmuz is reportedly undelineated & definitely elusive
aletheia kallos <aletheiak-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
& come to think of it i keep liking my sloping natural arrowhead chink shoulder guess better when i try to think of how this outlandish location might have come to be selected for the tripoint in the first place for kzuz converges from the north along the 56th meridian until it reaches the end of the plateau & then goes slightly over the edge but evidently only as far down the chink as this marvelously coincident natural landmark beach point overlooking the lake if not actually projecting into it as a point of land but tmuz & kztm do not in fact converge with kzuz there exactly at right angles notwithstanding the topo depiction of them along a parallel of latitude as if to form a perfect tee junction for that detail is a totally bogus border depiction i must tell you but rather they converge there as if offhandedly to meet this idealized rendezvous point at whatever slightly odd angles they must better maps show they may both follow geodetic line segments to the trijunction target point but neither of them is a true east west line & they do form a distinct angle by converging at the landmark in this happenchance way & i think it is precisely their slightly unusual angles of convergence that really do point to this arrowhead tip & give away their special relationship to it as they perform & celebrate deliberately what the 56th meridian has done only by chance otherwise kzuz might have continued south thru this wilderness until it really did strike a single continuous tmuz & kztm at right angles for the soviets could just as easily have arbitrarily done it that way as they perhaps really did do it somewhat more sensibly this way or so i would dare to speculate at this point --- aletheia kallos <aletheiak-/[email protected]> wrote: > agreed about all of the following > except i would still say the tripoint is not > necessarily within > altho at least partly surrounded by > your relatively flat lacustrine basin > > --- "Lowell G. McManus" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have gone to Jesper's source, zoomed in, and > > captured a clearer > > version for our interpretation. It is attached. > > > > First, the contours are in feet, not meters. (The > > Map Mart site says > > so.) Note also that the distance scale is in > miles. > > > > The contour interval is 250 feet. On this map, > > contours of 0, 250, 500, > > 750, and 1,000 feet are shown. > > > > Between the 750 and 500 contours (to the northeast > > of the lake, anyway), > > we find the depiction of the escarpment. > > > > Descending from the 0 contour, we find, first, the > > shore of the > > intermittent lake, then the shore of the more > > permanent lake. > > > > Within the northwestern lobe of the intermittent > > lake, we find several > > shoals that rise above the 0 contour (although > they > > are covered, > > incongruously, with the blue stipple indicating > > intermittent > > inundation). The tripoint appears upon the > shoulder > > of one of these > > shoals, just slightly above the 0 contour. > > > > I think that we can conclude that this best-known > > topographic map > > (whatever its possible imprecisions) shows the > > tripoint in a relatively > > flat lacustrine basin. > > > > Lowell G. McManus > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak-/[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:37 PM > > Subject: Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] yikes kztmuz is > > reportedly undelineated > > & definitely elusive > > > > > > > as you say could not be very much higher > > > please be aware > > > the map if it can be believed shows the tripoint > 2 > > > distinct levels above the normal water level of > > the > > > recognizably outlined lake > > > & > > > at least some if not all the elevation gradients > > are > > > 250 meters apart > > > > > > --- "Lowell G. McManus" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> Jesper, > > >> > > >> Thanks very much for the three PDF maps of the > > area > > >> and the referral to Google Earth. When Google > > Earth > > >> debuted, I tried it, but it did not work for > me. > > I > > >> tried it again today, and it works great! > > >> > > >> I think that your PDF maps demonstrate that the > > lake > > >> in the tripoint depression is variable in level > > and > > >> size over time or season, flooding the tripoint > > at > > >> times. Since this appears to be the case, the > > >> tripoint could not be very much higher in > > elevation > > >> than the more regularly wet lakebed farther > > >> southeast. > > >> > > >> Lowell G. McManus > > >> Leesville, Louisiana, USA > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:47 PM > > >> Subject: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] yikes kztmuz > > is > > >> reportedly undelineated & definitely elusive > > >> > > >> > > >> No fancy results of terrain (or 3d) to show > as > > the > > >> entire areas is very flat. The tripoint itself > is > > at > > >> water level at 0m and the surroundings do no go > > >> higher than 160 meters. > > >> > > >> But please learn to use the free Google > Earth, > > >> downloadable at http://earth.google.com , > > yourself. > > >> > > >> Jesper > > >> -- > > >> Borderbase - your online guide to > international > > >> borders and tripoints > > >> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/