SV: afcnpk test was a success so continuing with afcntj & afirpk etc

AFCNPK adjusted for next GE update.
 
I wishI had noted my reasons for placing it there....
 
Totally off mark.
 
Jesper
 
--
Borderbase - your online guide to international borders and tripoints
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
 

  _____  

Fra: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] På
vegne af aletheia kallos
Sendt: 8. september 2006 15:48
Til: [email protected]
Emne: [BoundaryPoint] afcnpk test was a success so continuing with afcntj &
afirpk etc



this especially nice afcnpk result at the gmane
archive 
http://article.
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9194>
gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9194
has the image & explanation all on a single easy page

so
the present attachments similarly revisit afcntj &
afirpk 
in order to fill these back in also with a
corresponding level of detail
before continuing forward at this level with the rest
of the world tour

please look again in each case for the little
measurement line extending from the erroneous google
overlay tripoint position to the little red square
marking the corrected tripoint position

following are the explanations for these again
first afcntj & then afirpk
just so everything will again be collected in one easy
place

> > all 3 treaties mentioning this tripoint
> > namely afcn & afsu & cnsu
> > actually delineate their convergent borders along
> the ridge lines & water divides
> > which tho not necessarily always the same thing
> everywhere
> > do meet perfectly on the soviet topos
> > at their common trijunction point nearest the
summit
> of povalo shveikovski
>
http://mapy.
<http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/J-43-V.jpg>
mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/J-43-V.jpg
> 
> for this reason i would place the pushpin at the
snowy
> ridge junction
> east southeastward of the tripoint position shown in
> the google border line overlay
> as indicated there at roughly
> n lat 37d14m02s & e long 74d63m23s
> 
> & i would consider that correct only to within about
> 100 meters
> owing to the limitations of the photography &
geocoord
> registry etc
> albeit the best known try to date

> per the treaties & soviet topos this tripoint is
> evidently on the highest summit of the kuh i malik
> siah massif
>
http://mapy.
<http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/H-41-V.jpg>
mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/H-41-V.jpg
> tho it isnt absolutely clear which of the several
> roughly equally high points this actually refers to
> 
> my fairly confident guess tho is that the google
> borders are showing this situation almost exactly
> right 
> for a change
> even tho the tripoint depiction does clearly fall a
> bit below the peak & in fact some 50 meters east of
> the likeliest summit point
> which my mouse makes out to be at about
> n lat 29d51m41s & w long 60d52m41s
> 
> & this is offered with the usual caveat of up to 100
> meters of possible error
> but only if i do indeed have the right summit
> for otherwise this guess could still be much farther astray

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail. <http://mail.yahoo.com> yahoo.com