Re: stretching the quest for a real stretchable latex tripoint to stretch
"Lowell G. McManus" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006701c6de87$6c73d6c0$e9ba694b@DC964111> |
The map that I promised was a map of the 1806-1819 de facto Neutral Ground, worked out as a practical solution between the American and Spanish military officers in the field (quite independent of their political bosses higher up). It is found in the BP Files section with the name neutral.jpg and is explained in the last two paragraphs of BP post 14285 at your third link below. I did not indicate any tripoint between the Neutral Ground and the remainders of American Louisiana and Spanish Texas because of uncertainty in the location of the international boundary north of the Neutral Ground. Indeed, it was that same uncertainty that necessitated both the Neutral Ground in the first instance and the Adams-de OnÃs treaty that would replace it with a de jure boundary in the second. The only reason that the de facto Neutral Ground was not erected farther north was that the land north of the 32nd parallel was not yet the subject of much interest (navigation on the Red River being blocked by the "Great Raft," a 150-mile log jam that was removed by 1839). However, if you are driven to find a tripoint (which you undoubtedly are), I, as a resident of the former Neutral Ground, can offer some analysis that might be helpful. In the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, the USA bought from France the French claim to Louisiana, without specifying any western boundary. Most strictly, that could be interpreted historically as the land west of the Mississippi River that drained into the same. This means that the drainage divide between the basins of the Red and Sabine rivers would have been the boundary. The USA was desirous of the most liberal (western) interpretation of the boundary of Louisiana as it could put over on the Spanish. Thus, the 1804 creation of the Territory of Orleans was "to extend west to the western boundary of the said cession." In 1812 when Louisiana was admitted to the Union, its western boundary was specified at the middle of the Sabine River to the 32nd parallel, and from there due north. Note that this was in the midst of the life span of the de facto military Neutral Ground and was seven years before the 1819 Adams-de OnÃs treaty would place the de jure US-Spanish boundary on the west bank of the Sabine River to the 32nd parallel and thence northward. So, it is clear that, in 1812, the Congress was admitting into the Union prospectively the western fringes of Louisiana that it hoped eventually to obtain de jure. The US waited until after the 1819 treaty was fully ratified in 1821 before it occupied the erstwhile Neutral Ground militarily with the establishment of Fort Jesup in 1822. So, if you forced me to draw you a tripoint at the northern end of the Neutral Ground, I would place it in De Soto Parish at the intersection of the Sabine-Red drainage divide with the 32nd parallel, centered roughly six miles southeast of Mansfield. Actually, the complexity of the drainage divide in that vicinity seems that it would produce three tripoints, with a Spanish exclave surrounded by the USA and the Neutral Ground. Of course, it never came to that. Of more fascination to me is the anomaly that existed in the western half of the Sabine River. Since the 1812 admission of Louisiana had prematurely placed its western boundary at the middle of the river, and the 1819 treaty placed the international boundary on the west bank, that left the western half of the Sabine as unorganized territory of the United States until 1848. That's when the Congress authorized the State of Texas (annexed three years earlier) to extend its jurisdiction to the middle of Sabine Pass, Sabine Lake, and the Sabine River to the 32nd parallel. That narrow part of the State of Texas, in which I swam three weeks ago, was never part of the Republic of Texas! Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak-/[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:52 AM Subject: [BoundaryPoint] stretching the quest for a real stretchable latex tripoint to stretch > this fresh news item about an imminent neutral ground > cleanup party > http://www.2theadvocate.com/features/travel/4201376.html > jogged my memory back to this excellent golden oldie > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/14259 > which you may also recall > along with its equally illustrious second shoe > dropping > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/14285 > > but which still left one guessing & reaching & > stretching for any handle at all on the elusive but > allegedly real > de facto latex neutral ground tripoint > which actually lived > or else was really stillborn > if thats not stretching it in this case too > during the first decades of the 19th century > > my guess is > the quest got stretched into an unresolved sawanabori > of the calcasieu > which however interesting & possibly even contributory > to an ultimate resolution of this supposed lalatxtx > tripoint > came to a dead stop there in any case > like a snapped elastic band > > but all efforts to pin la latex tex down thus far > reported here > i believe > & all my subsequent efforts too > have resulted only in establishing a vague triarea & > triline at the farthest reaches of the lalatxtx condo > or nondo > extending perhaps all the way from about zwolle to > about logansport > & thus perhaps comprising several hundreds of square > miles of 1806lalatx1819 territorial uncertainty too > rather than any specific & exact 1806lalatxtx1819 > tripoint > > like say very roughly all the sabine riverfront on > this map > http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=31.93501&lon=-93.93668&s=250&size=l&u=4&datum=nad27&layer=DRG > or better yet if zoomed out once or twice > > > but did i miss the promised tripoint treasure map > or hasnt it surfaced yet > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:BoundaryPoint-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/