SV: SV: SV: BEFRLU

No other markers were found.
 
But it was an awfull wet day, and we were tired after a week on the road.
 
It's a very accessable place in central Europe so I am surprised nobody else
actually explored it also.
 
Jesper

  _____  

Fra: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] På
vegne af aletheia kallos
Sendt: 30. september 2006 19:22
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] BEFRLU



i agree 
it looks like a belu marker to me also
& i too place it in belgian territory 
since it is in the crotch between the befr & belu
streams

but what it is actually witnessing is the end of belu 
naturally enough
it seems to me
& not the end of befr 
which also happens to end there 
it is true
but probably has a different terminal marker nearby

so it doesnt strike me as strange at all

in fact i think you reported some other markers in the
neighborhood

--- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@nicolette.
<mailto:jesper%40nicolette.dk> dk>
wrote:

> I think Harry argument was something in line with it
> being the wrong marker
> on the wrong territory.
> 
> If the confluence is the tp, the marker is in BE, so
> if the marker is a FRLU
> marker is is strange - it does appears to be a BELU
> marker
> (http://www.nicolett <http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12>
e.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12
>
<http://www.nicolett
<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12&c2=87>
e.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12&c2=87>
> &c2=87) . I
> think the FRLU are concrete blocks.
> 
> Jesper 
> 
> --
> Borderbase - your online guide to international
> borders and tripoints
> http://www.nicolett <http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase> e.dk/borderbase
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> Fra: BoundaryPoint@ <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:BoundaryPoint@ <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com] På
> vegne af aletheia kallos
> Sendt: 29. september 2006 22:40
> Til: BoundaryPoint@ <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] BEFRLU
> 
> 
> 
> great
> i will of course stand by for any further
> clarifications from europe
> but looking on from this side of the pond
> & so long as we still havent seen any of the 3
> treaties 
> your newly added & in fact best available map
> enlarged
> here
> http://article.
>
<http://article.
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9339>
gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9339>
> gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9339
> does show the tripoint precisely at the stream
> confluence
> 
> & no matter if we can or cant yet pinpoint it on a
> satpic really
> 
> nor that we cant yet identify the name of this tiny
> tributary creek
> 
> for i do think we have at last nailed it on the
> ground
> 
> --- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@nicolette.
> <mailto:jesper%40nicolette.dk> dk>
> wrote:
> 
> > I agree, satpic too unclear.
> > 
> > On GCEBE 2001 we had much discussion of the actual
> > tripoint, as Peter's map
> > showed BEFR parallel with the stream. Parallel
> with
> > BEFR stream goes a
> > fence, which could have been the true border. But
> we
> > all know maps are not
> > made for freaks and some times borders are known
> to
> > be off the line to show
> > other features.
> > 
> > Harry seemed to believe the marker was the actual
> > tripoint. Not sure of the
> > argument. Maybe he can explain again.
> > 
> > Jesper
> > 
> > --
> > Borderbase - your online guide to international
> > borders and tripoints
> > http://www.nicolett
> <http://www.nicolett <http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase> e.dk/borderbase>
e.dk/borderbase
> > 
> > 
> > _____ 
> > 
> > Fra: BoundaryPoint@
> <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:BoundaryPoint@
> <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com] På
> > vegne af aletheia kallos
> > Sendt: 29. september 2006 18:50
> > Til: BoundaryPoint@
> <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: Re: [BoundaryPoint] BEFRLU
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > bravo again
> > this is a new state of play here if i am not
> > mistaken
> > http://lb.wikipedia
> > <http://lb.wikipedia
> <http://lb.wikipedia <http://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:3L>
.org/wiki/Image:3L>
> .org/wiki/Image:3L>
> > .org/wiki/Image:3LännereckRodange01.jpg
> > or at least it is for me
> > 
> > for if i am reading the above pic correctly
> > then we are looking at a much more pronounced
> stream
> > confluence than i had previously supposed existed
> > there
> > 
> > for it now seems to me that the river chiers
> > carrying
> > the belu convergent across the foreground is being
> > met
> > by an unnamed or unknown creek carrying the befr
> > convergent in from behind the belu terminal marker
> > 
> > & if so then the exact tripoint is evidently
> > situated
> > in the confluence 
> > at or just beyond the lower left corner of the pic
> > where the frlu convergent on the chiers below the
> > confluence doent quite reach the framed area 
> > 
> > first reports from the scene in the overgrowth of
> > summertime were somewhat sketchy & left me without
> > much confidence as to the exact tripoint position 
> > in relation to the markers & terrain
> > 
> > here tho in this pic there doesnt seem to be much
> > room
> > for doubt
> > 
> > we just dont yet have a satpic or a map good
> enough
> > to
> > show it all up
> > including your latest map also just received 
> > 
> > or wouldnt you agree
> > 
> > --- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@nicolette.
> > <mailto:jesper%40nicolette.dk> dk>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > BEFRLU from new angle
> > > 
> > > http://lb.wikipedia
> >
> <http://lb.wikipedia
>
<http://lb.wikipedia <http://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr%C3%A4il%C3%A4nnereck>
.org/wiki/Dr%C3%A4il%C3%A4nnereck>
> .org/wiki/Dr%C3%A4il%C3%A4nnereck>
> > .org/wiki/Dr%C3%A4il%C3%A4nnereck
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Borderbase - your online guide to international
> > > borders and tripoints
> > > http://www.nicolett
> > <http://www.nicolett
> <http://www.nicolett <http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase> e.dk/borderbase>
> e.dk/borderbase>
> e.dk/borderbase
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around 
> > http://mail. <http://mail. <http://mail. <http://mail.yahoo.com>
yahoo.com>
> yahoo.com> yahoo.com 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail. <http://mail. <http://mail.yahoo.com> yahoo.com> yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail. <http://mail.yahoo.com> yahoo.com