Re: Re: something or other

hahahahaha
you are the consummate victim of all my atrocities
hahahahahaha

--- "L. A. Nadybal" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Did I think you were complaining?  Yes, and in a
> most belittling way.
>  I also thought, rightly so, that you were once
> again demonstrating
> your lack of people skills - your inability to
> perceive what things
> you write generally sound like to others as
> evidenced by the retreats
> that come every time you are called on something. 
> Straighten up and
> have a care.
> LN
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], aletheia
> kallos <aletheiak@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > hahaha
> > but did you think i was complaining
> > hahahaha
> > 
> > on the contrary len
> > 
> > it is you who are complaining 
> > of my atrocity
> > hahahahaha
> > as well as not paying attention
> > as you freely admit
> > & so no problem
> > 
> > 
> > all i am commenting on here below & again now is
> how
> > far off target you obviously are in offering this
> > posting to boundarypoint
> > 
> > & understandably so 
> > in view of your proud disregard for our actual
> topic
> > 
> > & i have no complaint with that 
> > nor with you
> > nor with your doing that or being that way here
> > nor with your being here
> > 
> > in fact i couldnt be happier here 
> > with you or without you
> > on target or off
> > 
> > indeed
> > just being in such a fine & pointy place makes me
> > independently happy
> > as i see it does for many others too
> > 
> > perhaps even for you sometimes 
> > 
> > 
> > so please do be as disregardful as you like
> > 
> > for it really doesnt matter
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > & yet 
> > at the same time
> > when you are so off target in a place expressly
> > devoted to taking fine aim at a clearly stated &
> very
> > fine & very rare & very special objective 
> > & to then evaluating the relative success of such
> fine
> > tries
> > you may & probably should expect some
> correspondingly
> > fine feedback to that effect
> > 
> > for there really is a point to boundarypoint
> > i assure you
> > 
> > & you can certainly deny it & or try to blunt it &
> or
> > complain about it
> > or about the way someone else relates to it or to
> you
> > 
> > but that doesnt make it go away or become less
> fine
> > 
> > for this fineness & specialness is all we have
> really
> > agreed to by being here together
> > 
> > we have agreed we are interested in a special
> category
> > of fine targets
> > 
> > the multipoints
> > 
> > & we take aim at & evaluate our successes at
> hitting
> > these targets
> > 
> > & there is no complaint when someone misses or
> even
> > slobbers 
> > 
> > not even when they miss so hideously as you almost
> > always seem to do
> > 
> > but it still does give rise to the usual
> evaluations &
> > causes a bit more hilarity than usual in some
> cases
> > 
> > so rest assured you are enormously entertaining 
> > to me at least
> > whether you mean to be entertaining or
> multipointing
> > or not
> > 
> > --- "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm rarely confused and almost never lost.  I'm
> > > always "disregardful"
> > > of everything contained in your atrocious
> wordiness,
> > > however, so you
> > > might consider saving on capital letters with
> > > someone else.  If anyone
> > > else were to complain, then I'd pay attention.
> But
> > > for you, if you
> > > don't like my presence, you know where the
> > > deregister button is.  
> > > 
> > > LN 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected],
> "aletheiak"
> > > <aletheiak@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yikes but are you sure you just came back in
> to
> > > the right place len
> > > > 
> > > > for i think you may either be confused about
> or
> > > disregardful of our
> > > topic & us again
> > > > seeing as boundarypoint is actually devoted to
> > > multipointing
> > > > rather than abandoned harbor leases or any of
> the
> > > other topics you
> > > are again describing 
> > > > here
> > > > 
> > > > & our actual group description
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
> > > > has always made this focus of ours quite clear
> 
> > > > & still does
> > > > it seems to me
> > > > even tho it has often been innocently
> overlooked 
> > > > as well as deliberately ignored 
> > > > 
> > > > & the extrinsic subjects you keep bringing
> back
> > > here may well have
> > > been addressed here 
> > > > at one time & may very well have been left
> unended
> > > here too
> > > > 
> > > > but that is because they were misdirected here
> in
> > > the first place
> > > > & are still misdirected here when they return 
> > > > 
> > > > i hope you do find your way to wherever you
> > > thought you were & think
> > > you are or meant to 
> > > > go tho
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], "L. A.
> > > Nadybal" <lnadybal@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I just came in to report on a subject
> previously
> > > addressed here that
> > > > > was left un-ended.  Those of you who
> remember
> > > Wolfgang Schaub might be
> > > > > happy to hear he never let loose on the
> topic
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:BoundaryPoint-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/