Re: Re: Joke?

aletheia kallos <aletheiak-/[email protected]> Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point
Message-ID <[email protected]>
thanx anton good idea 
& it is true that members may discuss anything they
like here at bp
tho i believe these curious notions of destruction &
blasting are original with you

& 
since i am pleased to have been at cause 
front & center
in the creation of both these fine groups you are
referring to
i can tell you boundarypoint has always been devoted 
pure & simple 
to the 
a c t i v i t y 
of multipointing
& indeed to the specifically multidimensional 
p u r s u i t 
of happiness
rather than just to multipoints 
as you still seem to believe
let alone to many or any other 
t h i n g s
as you still seem to hope

for the action of finding the many in the one is the
only thing here
nor has there ever been any change in our focus
sudden or otherwise

& if you will reread carefully & impartially the
entire description you have selectively distorted here
below
i think you may finally come to agree & relax about
this 

but it is also true that our aim has gotten better
here thru the years
& that our focus has actually been sharpening ever
since & thanx to our creation & promotion of the
spinoff groups 
where different interests have been expressly invited

so really we are creating the best of all worlds
& destroying nothing 
so far as i can see

--- Anton Zeilinger <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> you've summed up quite nicely the destructive
> effects of a single 
> person's actions, who suddenly decided that
> BoundaryPoint would be 
> about a single issue, namely "multipoints" (contrary
> to the group 
> description which says "as well as boundary related
> interests including 
> general boundary issues, multipointing, boundary
> cartography and 
> boundary photographs") and blasted everyone who
> dared to be of a 
> different opinion. Ironically this person himself
> had participated in 
> numerous other discussions in the beginning of
> BoundaryPoint, all 
> before changing his opinion.
> 
> I suggest to you and all other interested readers
> who want to discuss 
> general boundary issues to join 
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BorderPoint
> 
> and leave BoundaryPoint to the person who submits 99
> % of its post 
> anyway.
> 
> Cheerio,
> Anton
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected],
> "borisinamerica" 
> <borisinamerica@...> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > I do not understand this group. All you seem to do
> is argue about
> > content, write funny and the same person posts
> almost all the messages
> > (or most of them).
> > 
> > Sad and boring. 
> > 
> > Boris
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:BoundaryPoint-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/