SV: SV: My Two Cents

"Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase" <jesper-bACkHVQ/[email protected]> Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:03:28 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point
Message-ID <005801c746db$4c4b8bb0$6502a8c0@mycom>
I really don’t hope anybody want to delete or close BoundaryPoint.

 

It’s our “childhood memories” within our border universe.

 

Jesper

 

  _____  

Fra: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] På vegne af Bill Hanrahan
Sendt: 1. februar 2007 17:28
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] My Two Cents

 

Why would you want to delete BoundaryPoint from the historical record?  It contains a wealth of information.  If you don't wish to use BoundaryPoint, simply don't use it.  There are those of us who do.

 

Bill

 

On 2/1/07, nj55er <spookymike@aol. <mailto:[email protected]> com> wrote: 

I agree with Jesper. BoundaryPoint has become superfluous. Time for
gentle euthenasia. In response to the mysterious BP Owner, if
member(s) had become abusive, then I would concur with their being
banished. Anyone looking for abuse can join a political blog. 
Boundaries and their ilk are supposed to be fun!

Michael Schwartz

--- In BoundaryPoint@ <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com , "Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase"
<jesper@...> wrote:
>
> In the beginning BoundaryPoint was fun and interesting with many
discussions
> going on every day, including just borders and other geographical stuff, 
> which I believe we all anyway have an interest in. And many good
names and
> forces participated.
> 
> 
> 
> I don�t remember Mike being so �difficult� in the early stages, but I
> remember his personal writing style which I (and many others) most
of the
> time just skipped. This probably was a shame, since I have lots of
respect
> for his knowledge, research and insight. We told him many times that he 
> should not make his readers work so hard or even give up in advance.
It also
> scared new people away. 
> 
> 
> 
> Then somehow it clicked for Mike, who somehow only is interested in 
points
> (what was he doing on Ellis Island then?), and believed
BoundaryPoint was
> only for points. All the rest of us with wider interests got pushed
around,
> and finally � perhaps too late � had to divert all traffic to the 
new group
> BorderPoint. Everybody seemed happy for this strange alternative and
> division. At that point I left BoundaryPoint to Mike and his points,
and was
> happy at Borderpoint. But I also tried to run through all the world 
> tripoints with Mike at BoundaryPoint not disturbing the people at
> BorderPoint.
> 
> 
> 
> So what do we want with BoundaryPoint? And with Borderpoint? Without
Mike in
> BoundaryPoint we may as well close it. 
> 
> 
> 
> And why still this childish secrecy with the BoundaryPoint owner? Odd�
> 
> 
> 
> Jesper
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> Fra: BoundaryPoint@ <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
[mailto: <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>  [email protected]] P�
> vegne af Ernst Stavro Blofeld
> Sendt: 31. januar 2007 20:09
> Til: BoundaryPoint@ <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: [BoundaryPoint] My Two Cents
> 
> 
> 
> hear, hear..
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "spookymike@..." <spookymike@...> 
> To: BoundaryPoint@ <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:17:15 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] My Two Cents
> 
> Having watched this group become practically silent the past few
months, it
> seems obvious to me that the cause is the (presumed) banning of Mike
Donner, 
> the infamous "alathelia kallos." Mike was a pain in the butt, and
his rants
> complaining about those who strayed from the purity of multipointing,
> combined with weird use/non-use of punctuation and 
non-capitalization could
> get annoying. BUT, like it or not, he was the one who kept the pot
boiling,
> and I for one miss his frequent posts on a wide range of topics. 
> 
> Does anyone believe this group is better for his absence? Quieter, yes. 
> More civil, yes. More interesting, NO!
> 
> My suggestion is to invite Mike back into the group and live with his
> eccentricities. If he gives someone a hard time occasionally for
straying
> from the path of purity of multipointing, so what? Let him rant. 
Sticks
> and stones...... .
> 
> Anyone else want to weigh in?
> 
> Michael Schwartz
> Mendham, New Jersey
> 
> 
>
<http://pr.atwola. <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=ht> com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=ht 
> tp%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom%2Fnewaol> Check out the new AOL. Most
> comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to
millions
> of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> We won't tell. Get more on shows
>
< http://us.rd. <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49980/*http:/tv.yahoo.com/collections/265%0d%0a> yahoo.com/evt=49980/*http:/tv.yahoo.com/collections/265%0d%0a>
> you hate to love
> (and love to hate): Yahoo!
>
< http://us.rd. <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49980/*http:/tv.yahoo.com/collections/265%0d%0a> yahoo.com/evt=49980/*http:/tv.yahoo.com/collections/265%0d%0a>
> TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
>