Re: Objectivity [was Re: Re: [Israel.pm] Is University Really Necessary?]

"Arik Baratz" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.hackers.israel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 30 Mar 2007 00:39:48 -0700, Shlomi Fish <shlomif-ik1l9ssToec+JF/[email protected]> wrote:
> > Define "Evil"?
>
> Quoting my previous message:
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> The meaning of moral in Neo-Tech is simple and direct: Whatever is consciously
> done to help fill human biological needs is good and moral (e.g., the
> productive actions of honest people). Whatever is consciously done to harm or
> prevent the filling of human biological needs is bad and immoral (e.g., the
> destructive actions of mystics and neocheaters).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> As you can see it's even a scientific definition. In this context "evil"
> == "bad".

Bah. This definition sucks. Neo-Tech might think it's okay and you
might agree. I don't. It's using subjective terms in a "scientific"
definition. Nope, I don't buy it.

-- Arik
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.