Re: beyondhom thoughts besides Ars?

"Shannon Nelson [email protected] [beyondhomeopathy]" <[email protected]> Tue, 20 May 2014 14:40:18 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.culture.homeopathy.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
But a teen, esp a teen boy, not so likely to be chilly…


On May 20, 2014, at 9:17 AM, "'[email protected]' [email protected] [beyondhomeopathy]" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Look at thermals. 
> Ars is chilly sulphur is usually hot.
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> 
> 
> From: Irene de Villiers [email protected] [beyondhomeopathy] <[email protected]>; 
> To: <[email protected]>; 
> Subject: Re: beyondhom thoughts besides Ars? 
> Sent: Tue, May 20, 2014 1:46:27 PM 
> 
>  
> 
> On May 20, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Liz Brynin [email protected] [beyondhomeopathy] wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > I also think this behaviour is very Sulphur! And lots of young people will present as Sulphur.
> 
> It is not Sul behavior. And nobody can change their spots with age. Those are old assumptions that do not hold any water. The devil is in the details....
> 
> Ars and Sul make a mess, but not the same mess, and not for the same reasons. (as in my previous email) 
> 
> Ars ad Sul are both intelligent, but again it is in different ways - the details matter, they should not be confused with each other.
> 
> Ars is clever in what they think up, in what they invent intellectually, which they may well then implement.
> Sul is clever as a tinkerer - to do with figuring out how things work and how to use them to best advantage.
> Ars does not care how things work, other than towards inventing a better one, not getting new tweaks out of an existing thing by understanding it better, like Sul.
> 
> Physically also they are very different. 
> Ars I also described already. Sul is quite different. Sul is heavy-boned, short neck, substantial body especially the upper body with a very wide chest, not deep though, rather flat ribcage - big shoulders and upper arms, moderate size feet, generally a large individual, much heavier than they look, but not tall and not wiry like Ars. 
> 
> Young people present as THEIR type. They cannot present as someone else's type. They are BORN with their type. It can be determined at birth from their traits even at that age. Their type does not change to another type, but each type has a specific look at each age. It is these variations we need to learn instead of trying to onfuse a young Ars for a Sul. 
> 
> Young Sul has a consistent appearance, behavior and physique.
> Same with young Ars - or young any other type, each is consistent but unique to type. 
> Each type has a speceific appearance at each age, from newborn to old age, and which is not possible to confuse (if you study types) with any other type.
> 
> The notion that anyone who makes a mess is Sul, is just incorrect. It matters what kind of mess and why, and it differs by Innate Constitutional Type.
> 
> > Sulphur also has some OCD behaviours
> 
> OCD is to me far too much of a catch-all to be useful at all. Each type has VERY specific responses.
> 
> > - cannot stand other people's dirt. Checks plates to see that they are properly washed up before they will eat off them etc.
> 
> It is MORE relevant to Sul what *quality* the plates are. They wodl prefer it to be the best chiona. Ars could care less what quality the plates are, but may be fanatic about any germs they might catch. SUl wants the plates clean as a neat freak, not for persoanl health reasons like Ars.
> It is these differences in details - the reaasons they do things - not that they do them - that differentiate the types.
> 
> > Sulphur also appreciates beauty
> 
> not beauty - they apprecite *quality* - which is not the same thing exactly. Sul wants the latest gadget, not the model before, and Sul wants velvet not a fake version, and real leather, and good quality fudge, and the best wine, etc - they may claim they seek beauty but it is quality - being the best - that they admire.
> 
> Ars does not care about having the top of the line or latest model in everything. 
> They will probably invent what they want if it is not handy. 
> 
> > (even if occasionally they see beauty in things that others consider to be worthless)
> 
> I have yet to see this claimed feature of Sul. They seek the top choice of the options available, they do not care how others consider it. Sul does not see things as having worth just becasue others do.
> 
> > Look at the modalities, generalities - reaction to heat and cold;
> 
> Sul gets hot easily, and thirsrty, cannot stand hot weather. It makes snese, as their build is compact and dense so will overheat easily.
> Their limbs are shorter, and make strong levers, you will find them weight lifting.
> Ars is tall and wiry, an easy shape for cooling off, with a large surface area to volume ratio. No weight lifting for them, they will be long distance joggers more likely. No natural Sul joggers, they are too heavily built.
> 
> ALL features of a type make sense and are logical as a GROUP of features - physical features, activities, intellectual, health predispositions, all included. That group of features is there at birth, it is partly determined by DNA but includes a lot of other inherited features as well.
> Even their size and shape as a baby is specific to their ICT type. 
> Size and shape at different ages is specific to an ICT type, and will vary in a very specific way for each ICT type, over th eoir lifetime,
> 
> For example two types always born very small, are Sepia and Platina. 
> As adults, Sepias are still relatively small in stature, but Plats are the giants of this world, making even Puls look small, despite Plats being born the "runts". 
> The biggest ones at birth are Phos types, but while long limbed as adults, they are not the biggest types at all.
> The point is that newborn size is specific to ICT type, but a small or large infant does NOT predict adult size. newborn size and behavior predicts/pressents ICT type though.
> 
> Our repertories LACK the majority of features of any type. Only illness issues are well represented.
> But every type has a full set of features that are ICT-specific at every age, and wich are the norms for that ICT. We have yet to document all this. (It is what I have been working on for quite a long time now as these emails will show.)
> You will find the descriptions suit EVERY member of an ICT - there is no adult Ars with short legs, there is no toddler Ars with long legs. There is no Sul with a long neck or narrow shoulders, there is no Lyc with broad hips, no Ars with any bum flesh, and no Phos with heavy boning. These things are unchangeable and totally predictable - and the predictabi;ity applies at each age for the ICT - there is a specific set of features at each age. Every ICT develoips in a specific way, in other words. It cannot be otherwise. An individual only gets ONE set of inherited traits, in one of many predetermined groups of inherited features - and that group points unerringly to the individual's ONE specific ICT which is theirs - inherited - for life.
> 
> Watching ICT types arrive at birth is fun..... Every Sepia is born small with a pot belly and is very fiesty, every phos has a skinny shape with long legs at birth, but is a big baby,etc...
> As toddlers, and as children, each ICT has specific features - each ICT grows up in length at a specific age.
> Plat shoots up just before teenager stage, getting very long and lanky before filling out more during teen years. Ars shoots up a lot later and all in one year before age 15, Sul grows more gradually and evenly, etc.
> It is all related and specific to ICT, it does not vary. 
> 
> How each type behaves, grows, develops mentally, physically, etc also does not vary or look like some other type at any point (.....thinking that that happens, is a mistake that comes from failure to study each ICT type at all ages); it is specific to that type at a specific age.
> 
> Namaste,
> Irene
> --
> Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
> P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
> www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
> "Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
> 
> 
>