Re: beyondhom thoughts besides Ars?
"Shannon Nelson [email protected] [beyondhomeopathy]" <[email protected]> Wed, 21 May 2014 13:35:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.homeopathy.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks, Irene! Some more questions: - The ones you have mentioned are mineral or plant or (only one?) animal. Have you identified an ICT for any of the nosodes, e.g. Med, Psor, Syph, Carc, Tub? Or other infective agents? - What does this phrase mean? "inherited traits plus the matched remedy added ones." What are matched remedy added traits? - I know you have explained this in the past, but for my imperfect memory and imperfect email storage, can you outline the purposes for which you use a patient's / client's ICT remedy? I recall that it's a sometimes crucial, supportive intercurrent during treating of severe illness. How else do you use them? Thanks again! Shannon On May 21, 2014, at 9:11 AM, "Irene de Villiers [email protected] [beyondhomeopathy]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 20, 2014, at 9:02 PM, Shannon Nelson [email protected] [beyondhomeopathy] wrote: > > > > > Thanks Irene, another wonderful one! > > > > Do you have any comments about what remedies you have seen to occur as ICT, rather than as a traumatic, or illness-based, or ??? "layer"? > > Hi Shannon, Thanks.... > > As to what ICT types I have seen, there are many and some are a lot more common than others. This variation in distribution makes it hard to get them all documented, it is a huge body of work. > So I feel I have just started it, despite having spent so many years at it. It takes a lot of examples to fully confirm what is an ICT feature and what is not, and how each one is at a specific age. > ALl this to say - it is early days and impossible yet to say how many types there are. SO far I can not rule out anything. > > The commoner ones - with many individuals to reperesent the ICT - are like those that come up often here, Ars, Lyc, Phos, Puls, Sul, Calc, and some others. > Some less common ones are Colch, Spong, Lach, Plat, Stram. > In-between in incidence frequency are ones like Calc-phos, Ign, Nat-m, SIl, Sep..... > I think I so far counted about thirty or so that I have spotted and lined up with a specific remedy. > There are many more I am sure, now just sets of inherited traits that recur as I know from my prior genetics work but not yet linked with their specific remedy - or maybe a possible link but as yet unconfirmed by enough examples. > It is just hard to find the links between the inherited trait sets, and the remedy that correlates to them. I counted actual relevant rubrics in synthesis for some of the known ones, and it is less than one per cent. So it is not much to go on to make the initial tenuous link to a remedy, before it can be confirmed using multiple examples in multiple species (difficult with more rare ICTs) and only then it can be combined into one set of data that includes the inherited traits plus the matched remedy added ones. > I know it took me more than ten years to confidently document Plat for example, and when I did, I could then tell that I had missed one right under my nose for all that time:-) > > Sometimes there is one very weird rubric that causes me to suspect a remedy association, and following up with hours of rubric study may clinch it, or may do the opposite. It helps that Synthesis has the rubrics list for each remedy - and that I have the patience to go through ten thousand or more rubrics of a remedy to seek the one percent of rubrics that might pertain to inherited traits :-) > Once a match is made, it often gives the feeling of "why did I not see that before", as things start to stick me in the eye. But the initial connection can be hard to make. > Still, there have to be a lot more to find and confirm. Enough for all the sets of genetic traits that go in discrete groups. SO - bottom line I do not really know how many there are. Yet. > > It is all very logical however. It makes perfect sense that we have very few of certain types of personality - after all, the world turns based on a proper balance of people with different interests. We need entertainers, inventors, artists, dictators (eg to manage mass crisis situations and restore order over panic), health care folk, builders, designers, folk in a myriad of activity areas, and so on. There is so much logic to how it all works together. If you ever lived with a Lach, you'd know why that type is rare, two of them in one place would be a bit much.....One queen/king requiring curtseys and assuming regal-style orders will be unquestioned, is enough in one environment - there needs to be a good ratio of generals and troops - or as Lach might see it, - queens and plebs. > > Namaste, > Irene > -- > Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom. > P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220. > www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.) > "Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it." > >