Re: "The Great Debate"
Dave Crocker via Internet-history <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/29/2026 9:58 PM, Brian E Carpenter via Internet-history wrote: > So far, it has not done this. And at this point, I > feel that the IESG itself is a major factor in the delays." Concern over delays was widely held. I started noticing that WG Chairs were doing an excellent job of making sure that everyone got to participate, but were quite poor at pressing for forward progress. That was why I started the WG Chair Training sessions. Ostensibly it was to introduce new chairs to the formal IETF processes. While it did do that, it's real agenda was to sell the need to balance between ensuring fair opportunities to air views, with making forward progress. At the time, I thought it helpful. d/ -- Dave Crocker [email protected] bluesky: @dcrocker.bsky.social mast: @[email protected] +1.408.329.0791 Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter Northern California Coastal Region Information & Planning Coordinator American Red Cross [email protected] -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history