Re: IPv8...
Bill Ricker via Internet-history <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAbKA3VvfGzcoA2q1U7ttzH4nZsKiuxJ78+e101UAVaTVWcsNQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 5:30 PM the keyboard of geoff goodfellow via Internet-history <[email protected]> wrote: > *_The community should avoid wasting time on such proposals_*." > > was most enjoyably Padlipsky-esque in the way his 1982 {{RFC874}} Critique > of X.25 was > > "*Conclusion* > > *_**X.25 is not a good thing_*." Speaking as The Literary Estate of MAP, I concur with Geoff that Brian's above new anti-v8 dicta is delightful and fits MAP's sense 'technico-aesthetic criticism'. (I rather like V8 myself, but being cheap, I usually just buy the store's-own generic tomato juice.) At least my new fibre-to-home router has IPv6, finally ! // Bill in Boston // The Literary & Spiritus Estate of MAP -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history