Re: Quantifying OSI
John Day via Internet-history <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 16:34:59 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, John Larmouth of the UK had left the basic ASN.1 syntax a total mess. Uncompilable. First that had to be straightened out. But what proved to be much more important was PER, which was much more compact (compressing it often got larger) and less processing overhead. The purists liked BER. Today there are 10s of encoding rules for ASN.1. Take care, John > On May 11, 2026, at 14:39, Craig Partridge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:13 PM John Day <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Most of the work on ASN.1 was done by Bancroft Scott, but of course there was a committee working on it. >> That was after the Brits made a mess of it. > > Um, the ASN.1 BER design was entirely done by BBNers. (Deutsch, Resnik, Vittal, BBN report 4466 of 1980). > > -- > ***** > Craig Partridge's email account for professional society activities and mailing lists. -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history