Re: Quantifying OSI
Tom Lyon via Internet-history <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 14:43:10 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANxB0bS2_G2oBhJ2_vaF7KQFNzVr6hvj=7Q_qcMrF5VOUvj4QA@mail.gmail.com> |
Anyone else remember the Enterprise Network Event - 1988 in Baltimore? It was the peak of hype for the MAP/TOP flavor of OSI, complete with IEEE 802.4. Sun announced such a product there. Don't know if we ever sold any, but it got us past the dreaded corporate check-lists. https://historyofcomputercommunications.info/section/14.10/Enterprise-Network-Event-(OSI)-June/ On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 2:22 PM Brian E Carpenter via Internet-history < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes, there was *enormous* expenditure by major companies worldwide that > thought OSI was the key to the future. IBM had people working on SNA/OSI > integration (including marketing vapourware), both in the US (Research > Triangle Park) and Europe (La Gaude). DEC (mainly at Littleton, MA) > invested many millions in DECNET Phase V. Boeing also spent millions, I'm > sure; I have no knowledge about GM. Untold numbers of companies spent both > marketing and development millions under the influence of US-GOSIP, > UK-GOSIP, European Commission policy, etc. Not to mention startups who > thought OSI was an enormous future opportunity. I imagine that this was > largely limited to North America, Western Europe and Japan, but it > certainly included a lot more than sending people to meetings. I have no > idea how to estimate the total but I suspect the correct unit is probably > the gigadollar. > > The emerging national research and education networks in Europe also spent > large fractions of their budgets on OSI preparedness - probably much less > money than industry was spending, but real enough, between about 1985 and > the early 1990s. The same went for NASA and DoE in the US. > > Standards goers and their fine lunches and dinners were probably quite a > small fraction of the real total cost. > > Regards/Ngā mihi > Brian Carpenter > > On 12-May-26 08:43, Karl Auerbach via Internet-history wrote: > > Our company (Epilogue Tech.) was involved with ISO/OSI mostly via the > > MAP and TOP efforts by General Motors and Boeing. > > > > Those gatherings tended to be somewhat well attended, although I don't > > think many of the attendees were people who actually implemented things. > > > > --karl-- > > > > On 5/11/26 3:46 AM, John Day via Internet-history wrote: > >> That would be hard to calculate for the US. There were 5 OSI main > committees each with 15 - 20 or more participants in various subgroups. In > the US, US corporations paid for the time and travel of their participants. > Some companies (IBM, Honeywell, ATT, etc) would have multiple participants > in the same committee. There were multiple US meetings between major > international meetings every 9 months and international sub-group meetings > between the 9 month major meetings. > >> > >> The cost was all paid by the companies participating. In addition, > there were 802 meetings that were feeding into the OSI work. This was > especially true of how network management was gotten off the dime to get > around IBM stonewalling. All other 802 standards were process by an ISO > committee, because some countries saw IEEE as a US organization. > >> > >> I wouldn’t even hazard a guess at how many people or companies were > participating from the US. The Europeans did complain sometimes abut the > large US delegations to the meetings. > >> > >> Take care, > >> John Day > >> > >> > >> > >>> On May 10, 2026, at 23:53, Carl Malamud via Internet-history < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi - > >>> > >>> I’m trying to quantify the size of the OSI efforts. I’ve seen the 25 > >>> million ECU investment by the EU, and have some pointers to US > government > >>> efforts. Has anybody tried to collect these numbers? > >>> > >>> Also very interested in non-monetary indicators. I have easy access to > >>> number of IETF participants and count the traffic on mailing lists. Any > >>> similar metrics for OSI? The best indicator so far is “many fine > lunches > >>> and dinners” but surely there has to be something more scientific. > >>> > >>> With best regards, > >>> > >>> Carl > >>> -- > >>> Internet-history mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > >>> - > >>> Unsubscribe: > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > -- > Internet-history mailing list > [email protected] > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > - > Unsubscribe: > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history