Re: Internet without entrenched factions?
Scott Bradner via Internet-history <[email protected]> Fri, 15 May 2026 08:36:51 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
s/Beth/the/ (thanks Apple) > On May 15, 2026, at 8:28 AM, Scott Bradner via Internet-history <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On May 15, 2026, at 2:35 AM, Ole Troan via Internet-history <[email protected]> wrote: > ... >> >> Back to history. IPv6 should have had identifier/locator split from the start. I wasn’t there, but I understood it was close with Mike O’Dell’s 8+8 and GSE proposals? Anyone who can shed more light on what happened and why that path was not chosen? > > as I recall, the message I got back from Beth meeting where Mike discussed the proposal was that it broke multicast but at the time, I thought that the underlying reason > was closer to Brian's "too hard" (i.e. required too much thinking) > > Scott > -- > Internet-history mailing list > [email protected] > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > - > Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history