Re: capacity v bandwidth
Steve Crocker via Internet-history <[email protected]> Sun, 31 May 2026 15:27:55 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABf5zvJQDGLdo+NHm=dfBAdWu7prGKmou3q_zurew5A9XaATYg@mail.gmail.com> |
Jack, That's delightful. Reminds me of hearing about a lengthy discussion between, IIRC, Corby and Weizenbaum about 645. Apparently, the discussion went on for a while before they realized one person was talking about the course and the other about the machine. Collision among TLAs is, of course, rampant. I switched to four letter acronyms many years ago. You're probably familiar with the birthday problem: how big does a class have to be before there's a 50% chance that at least two students will have the same birthday? The answer is just 23. For TLA, assuming a uniformly random distribution, the 50% level is just 155 TLAs. And the distribution is not uniform at all, so the 50% level is fewer than 155. Steve On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 3:13 PM Jack Haverty via Internet-history < [email protected]> wrote: > Turning purple is a clear sign of psychological stress. Vint's escort > was probably contemplating the massive amount of paperwork required to > document the incident, the disciplinary hearings that would follow, as > well as considering what his or her new life would be like at the new > assignment on one of the outer islands of the Aleutians. > > I can only recall small bits of my own meeting experience. I'm not even > sure of where I was working at the time. It may have been while I was > at BBN, and involving a meeting somewhere in the metro DC area. Or it > may have been when I had a student job at the MIT Instrumentation Lab, > where navigation systems were developed for use in Apollo and > Minuteman. Anyway, it was a long time ago, in the late 1960s or 1970s. > > There was a meeting, and I was late for it. I wasn't a participant > giving a presentation, but more like a fly on the wall to learn about > some project. After getting through the check-in procedure in the > Entrance (with security clearances it could take a while...), I went > down a corridor, saw a meeting already in progress with a few dozen > people, most of them around a large table engaged in intense debate. I > found a chair against the wall and quietly sat down. No one noticed. > > The discussion involved DIA and DCA, which apparently "don't work well > together". As a techie nerd, I had heard of DIA and DCA, but hadn't had > any actual experience with them. They were both part of IBM's technical > architecture. DIA was Document Interchange Architecture, and DCA was > Document Content Architecture. I could believe that they didn't work > well together -- possibly designed by different committees or groups > within IBM. > > The discussion seemed to be focussed on comparing different scenarios, > and predicting what would happen in each. The main difference between > scenarios was apparently associated with "new debts". I thought perhaps > the current topic had something to do with budgeting. But someone > mentioned "new debts per second", which seemed a little strange. I > could believe "per year" or "per quarter" would make sense for financial > planning and decisions. But "per second"!? > > Finally someone put up a slide or document for some scenario. I had > heard what I expected to hear - "new debts". But the slide revealed it > was actually "nudets". I realized the discussion had been about NUclear > DETonations in different scenarios. The "per second" part was > frightening, which is probably why I still remember it. > > I was clearly in the wrong meeting. Here, DIA was Defense Intelligence > Agency. DCA was Defense Communications Agency. Nothing to do with IBM > technology. > > I quietly got up and left the room. > > I learned that day that the world suffers from a serious shortage of > acronyms. IP addresses are easy, just make the numbers longer. But > TLAs have to be just three letters, and that's not enough to avoid > conflicts and ambiguity. > > /Jack Haverty > > > On 5/31/26 10:59, the keyboard of geoff goodfellow via Internet-history > wrote: > > thanks vint! AND believe it or not (now that we know what the room was) > it > > just so happens there is a "vintage" 1976(!) picture of the NMCC at > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Military_Command_Center > > > > yours truly is now wondering what a present day/"modern era" of it must > > look like... :) > > > > g > > > > On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 10:47 AM Vint Cerf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Thanks for asking, Geoff. > >> > >> On my first day of work at ARPA (as it was then called in 1976), I had > to > >> report to the Pentagon to pick up my DOD building pass. I went into the > >> River Entrance and the guard told me to take a seat. Not long after, a > guy > >> came out of the bowels of the Pentagon, conferred with the guard who > >> pointed at me. The man came over to me and said something that I didn't > >> really hear [you all know I wear hearing aids ...] but assumed it was > >> something like "good morning" - so I nodded and he escorted me into one > of > >> the corridors. Soon we encountered another guard (Marine, armed) and > they > >> attached another badge. We continued deeper into the Pentagon, I picked > up > >> additional badges on the way until we entered a very big space with a > lot > >> of people with headsets, large displays, even larger displays on the > walls. > >> I said "This looks pretty elaborate for a personnel office." My escort > >> looked startled, turned purple (no kidding!) > >> > >> "Aren't you Mr. Smith!!??" he said. "No, I'm Vint Cerf. I'm just here to > >> pick up my building pass." My escort fell silent, whipped me around, > said > >> not another word, marched me through the reverse path, shedding badges > as > >> we went. I ended up back in the River Entrance. I had just inadvertently > >> visited the National Military Command Center. In all the years since, > >> despite my clearances, I have never returned to the NMCC! > >> > >> Vint Cerf > >> > >> > >> On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 12:53 PM the keyboard of geoff goodfellow via > >> Internet-history <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> vint, any chance you would be willing to recount to the list what > happened > >>> at the Pentagon on your first day at ARPA in 1976.. in how you > mistakingly > >>> got mistook for someone else in the reception area.. and ended up being > >>> walked thru multiple levels of guarded "security" checkpoints and > ended up > >>> in the "War Room" (or whatever it was) instead of the HR office > (recalling > >>> that ARPA didn't have an HR office)? > >>> > >>> over the years yours truly has retold that story of yours -- that iirc > you > >>> to related to us at a meeting or conference or something -- when people > >>> have said such-and-such a "security" breach thing was "fake"/"made up" > and > >>> couldn't ever possibly have happened in real life (such as say the > >>> security > >>> breach incident in the 1997 movie "Contact" that resulted in deliberate > >>> sabotage) where someone "got/slipped through security" > >>> > >>> g > >>> > >>> On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 9:07 AM vinton cerf via Internet-history < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Yes, I left Stanford in July or August and started at ARPA in Sept > 1976. > >>>> > >>>> V > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, May 31, 2026, 11:39 Lawrence Stewart via Internet-history < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> … Rummages around for information theory hat. > >>>>> > >>>>> I don’t think I am alone in holding that things with digital > >>> interfaces > >>>>> should say “bandwidth” and things with analog interfaces should say > >>>>> “capacity”. > >>>>> > >>>>> The Shannon-Hartley theorem is about the analog part of this. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the digital domain, I think almost everyone uses “bandwidth” to > >>> talk > >>>>> about peak available bits-per-second and “capacity” to talk about > >>> usable > >>>>> bits-per-second under certain loads, queuing policies, and the like. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the above, bandwidth is absolutely misused for digital circuits as > >>>>> compared to its analog meaning. Capacity, unfortunately, has two > >>>> meanings > >>>>> and they get muddled all the time. > >>>>> > >>>>> Language evolves and non of this offends me. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regarding Vint at Stanford I arrived there in September 1976, and by > >>> the > >>>>> time I was corresponding with Vint about using Ron Crane’s VDH line > >>>> driver > >>>>> to get SU-ISL connected to the SUMEX IMP, he was back in Washington I > >>>> think. > >>>>> -L > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Internet-history mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > >>>>> - > >>>>> Unsubscribe: > >>>>> > >>> > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > >>>> -- > >>>> Internet-history mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > >>>> - > >>>> Unsubscribe: > >>>> > >>> > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> [email protected] > >>> living as The Truth is True > >>> -- > >>> Internet-history mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > >>> - > >>> Unsubscribe: > >>> > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> After July 1, Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to: > >> Vint Cerf > >> 1435 Woodhurst Blvd > >> McLean, VA 22102 > >> > >> Until July 1, send postal/overnight deliveries to: > >> Google, LLC > >> 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor > >> Reston, VA 20190 > >> +1 650-224-2788 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > -- > Internet-history mailing list > [email protected] > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > - > Unsubscribe: > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > -- Sent by a Verified sender -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history