Re: capacity v bandwidth
Brian E Carpenter via Internet-history <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Jun 2026 08:57:24 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Unfortunately we failed to correct that terminological error in RFC 6214
(the IPv6 version of RFC 1149), and worse we discussed "bandwidth-delay product".
Regards/Ngā mihi
Brian Carpenter
On 01-Jun-26 07:53, D Waitzman via Internet-history wrote:
> In RFC-1149, I wrote "The bandwidth is limited to the leg length."
>
> I stand corrected that I should have used "capacity", but then the pun would not work.
> What's more important, the pun or technically accuracy? :-)
>
> --
> David Waitzman
>
--
Internet-history mailing list
[email protected]
https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
-
Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history