Re: Copyright/everincreasing times
Juhana Sadeharju <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:21:52 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers.announce |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LYRIS-1741495-3453397-2003.06.06-12.57.17--gclegav-gutvol-l#[email protected]> |
Hello. No I don't believe Disney ever gives anything in to public domain volunteerly. Afterall, they needed the latest copyright act so that the Disney characters will not go to public domain. They changed the past and that is what bugs me most. Many authors back at then could have choosen different license if they had known that new copyright laws changes the their work from public domain back to under copyright protection, for example. The copyright law is also biased toward publishers (or something sucks): there are many out-of-print books, but their authors and descendants cannot do nothing if publisher chooses not to print the books. Would it be fair that a copyright law requires that at least 2000 copies are printed yearly? Otherwise, the books would go to public domain. That could be another tradeoff between public and publishers. (A request to pay $1 per 50 years may not have an effect at all as it is a pocket money. As a publisher I would pay it in any case even the works would not have any value for me.) It is those forgotten public domain books and works for which we should ask publishers and authors to drop them to public domain. Then we would save their efforts in making the works usable again. Where I could get a list of those books/works not yet in public domain? I'm afraid our libraries do not have many books published between 1930-1960 and I cannot check them from shelves. OK. Publishers could choose to digitize the books theirself and sell them cheaply or not that cheaply. I will check that petition. Best regards, Juhana --- Personalized unsubscribe instructions for [email protected]: to unsubscribe send a blank email to [email protected]