Re: polishing polishing polishing
[email protected] (Carlo Traverso)
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "don" == don kretz <[email protected]> writes: don> In my own proofing the only way I can have any confidence at don> all that I'm catching all the italics is to scan through the don> entire text looking for nothing but. As soon as I start don> noticing (and marking) anything else, I start missing them. don> It also destroys my accuracy when the text already has don> italics markup in it and I must check for false positives. I agree. Especially with heavily marked-up texts, check one feature at a time. When I have already marked-up text to check the way that I prefer is to scan the images and stop whenever I find an italics, and check in the marked-up text the next occurrence of <i>. Using `grep "<i>"` instead of the text is even better. Carlo (sorry of the previous message, I was composing this one and something strange happened) _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d