Re: "New Kindle Fire Review"

Andrew Sly <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I agree that that does not appear appropriate. If you must, you could even
have some kind of "editor's choice" page, where you make it clear that it
is one person's opinion being reflected.

But such a review, with a prominent link on the home page just gives the
impression of someone lashing out in a fit of pique.

There are plenty of web sites out there that will review various ereader
machines. Why not just provide links to some of them?

--Andrew

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, don kretz wrote:

> It appears that the author is expressing the position of Project Gutenberg.
> Is this the case? If not, then I believe he needs to use the same
> communications channels available to the rest of us.
>
> Don Kretz
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, James Adcock <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I have to admit I am disappointed and disturbed that PG is publishing an
> > anti-Kindle rant on its website home page.  Especially since the content is
> > untrue.  I have a Kindle Fire and am not subjected to ads all the time.  I
> > do not have to download PG books first to my desktop computer and email
> > them to my Kindle Fire, etc.  So the review is clueless.****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > There is indeed much to dislike about the Kindle Fire, and Amazon, just as
> > there is much to dislike about the other ebook readers and ebook reader
> > vendors, including Apple and Google and BN, etc.****
> >
> >
> > But an intelligent review of these issues would be one based on factual
> > knowledge of the products ? plural ? and would discuss factually, based on
> > actual real expert user knowledge, what each product can actually do and
> > not do ? and then would leave the purchase decision up to the end customer
> > ? rather than plugging one product as being the ?solution.?  ****
> >
> >
> > Having PG shilling for one vendor does not increase its credibility nor
> > its prestige.****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Jim Adcock****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gutvol-d mailing list
> > gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
> > http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.