i said:
> even there, the information isn't _that_ useful,
> primarily because it's extremely difficult to
> proof a rewrapped text against its scan-set.
jim said:
> It would be if there weren't software to
> automatically unwrap the wrapped text.
well, except your program doesn't run on my machine, jim. :+)
besides, i don't think you've released your program, have you?
not even to the list here, let alone to the world at large. right?
further, although i have written such a program several times,
i am still not satisfied that it is friendly and transparent enough,
even for the relatively sophisticated person i'd expect as a user.
and the brief exposure i had to some output from your program
seemed like it was even more unfriendly than what mine gives...
so i'm kinda skeptical.
but fine, i'm always open for a demo.
wrap your p.g. version of huck to the scan-set you used.
better yet, give your app to someone else, and write up
instructions for them (and all of us) how they can do it.
don't forget that you need to include the pagebreaks too.
and it would be best if you got the end-line-hyphenates
exactly right, but it's ok if you join them on the top line
or the bottom line, as long as it's consistent throughout.
you just do the text. i'll code a tool to splice in the scans.
take your time, jim. but if it's as quick-and-easy as you say...
-bowerbird
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.