Re: Frankenstein
Robert Cicconetti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOE5KMEmtZhVMjRQaCKib+TM6HcQm+PBghSMKjzJX16ygV9d-w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Greg Newby <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:22:33PM +0000, Jon Hurst wrote: > > The other day I noticed that DP has recently uploaded a reworking of > > Frankenstein (#41445), the 12th most downloaded "work" on PG. I am > > assuming that it wasn't cross-checked against #84, so I've started the > > process of doing this. > > > > I've done the quick and easy bit and now have the text rewrapped to > > the images. I would like to get these files uploaded to #41445's > > fileset - they are sitting at: > > > > https://github.com/JonHurst/frankenstein > > > > If you want to just get a zip file rather than use git use: > > > > https://github.com/JonHurst/frankenstein/archive/master.zip > > > > I'm not sure what the protocol for doing this is, beyond it being > > "supported and encouraged" to have the scans present in the fileset of > > a given "expression" -- Greg, please let me know what you would like > > to do. > > You're saying you have the page scans that were used to make > #41445, but they were not provided as part of the original > file upload? > > Usually, scans come from whoever submitted the rest of the book. > > The only trick is there is a naming convention for the filenames. > Did you already do that (sorry, I did not look at the files > mentioned above)? There is a page at www.pgdp.net (somewhere) > that describes the naming convention. I have it somewhere, too. > > If so, just get in touch with the WWer who posted the files, to > arrange delivery. If you don't know who this is, or none of this > makes sense, email me directly or email pgww-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] > > Thanks! > > The page images are from a "photo-reprint" of the 1818 Lacking, Hughes, et al. edition, which, judging by the scans, is code for microfiche/microfilm. They're at DP for now, and when archived will end up at OLS. http://www.pgdp.net/c/project.php?id=projectID508470307d6dd Weren't there discussions at some point on automated or semi-automated uploading of DP scansets to PG? They all get archived, even the ones that aren't publicly displayed at OLS because of politeness/permission issues. -R C _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d