{Disarmed} Re: Frankenstein
Robert Cicconetti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOE5KMF4e9Y2YPJmYd5cQNyiNdkqiAK65mF4AEK3OaWkYP-Qgg@mail.gmail.com> |
Mine were getting held up for days to weeks for a while, but then started working. Something to do with the moderation. -Bob On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Greg Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think any of my posts are getting to gutvol-d any more. > > The version for this is The Annotated Frankenstein which used microfilm > scans, but didn't keep the pagination. I'd love to get the scans posted too. > > I also have a clean 1831 edition I'm working on. > > > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Robert Cicconetti wrote: > > >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Greg Newby <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:22:33PM +0000, Jon Hurst wrote: >> > The other day I noticed that DP has recently uploaded a >> reworking of >> > Frankenstein (#41445), the 12th most downloaded "work" on PG. >> I am >> > assuming that it wasn't cross-checked against #84, so I've >> started the >> > process of doing this. >> > >> > I've done the quick and easy bit and now have the text >> rewrapped to >> > the images. I would like to get these files uploaded to >> #41445's >> > fileset - they are sitting at: >> > >> > https://github.com/JonHurst/**frankenstein<https://github.com/JonHurst/frankenstein> >> > >> > If you want to just get a zip file rather than use git use: >> > >> > https://github.com/JonHurst/**frankenstein/archive/master.**zip<https://github.com/JonHurst/frankenstein/archive/master.zip> >> > >> > I'm not sure what the protocol for doing this is, beyond it >> being >> > "supported and encouraged" to have the scans present in the >> fileset of >> > a given "expression" -- Greg, please let me know what you >> would like >> > to do. >> >> You're saying you have the page scans that were used to make >> #41445, but they were not provided as part of the original >> file upload? >> >> Usually, scans come from whoever submitted the rest of the book. >> >> The only trick is there is a naming convention for the filenames. >> Did you already do that (sorry, I did not look at the files >> mentioned above)? There is a page at www.pgdp.net (somewhere) >> that describes the naming convention. I have it somewhere, too. >> >> If so, just get in touch with the WWer who posted the files, to >> arrange delivery. If you don't know who this is, or none of this >> makes sense, email me directly or email pgww-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> The page images are from a "photo-reprint" of the 1818 Lacking, Hughes, et >> al. edition, which, judging by the scans, is code for >> microfiche/microfilm. >> They're at DP for now, and when archived will end up at OLS. >> http://www.pgdp.net/c/project.**php?id=projectID508470307d6dd<http://www.pgdp.net/c/project.php?id=projectID508470307d6dd> >> >> Weren't there discussions at some point on automated or semi-automated >> uploading of DP scansets to PG? They all get archived, even the ones that >> aren't publicly displayed at OLS because of politeness/permission issues. >> >> -R C >> >> >> > -- > Greg Weeks > http://durendal.org:8080/greg/ > _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d