Re: Frankenstein

On 2012-11-28, Lee Passey wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 10:22 AM, Jon Hurst wrote:
> >I am intending to do the cross-checking with #84 at some point over
> >the next month or so, so I'll send any errata once I'm done.
>
> I wouldn't bother.
>   .
>   .
>   .

By cross-checking I mean using #84 to polish #41445, not the other way
round; I agree #84 is, as Don puts it, unassailable. I haven't done any
work on #41445 yet beyond wrapping the submitted utf-8 file using P3 as
a template. I really just wanted to harvest this particularly low
hanging and tasty fruit before it disappeared from DP, and I want to get
it into the #41445 fileset to make sure #41445 does not itself become
unassailable.

> Another simplistic page viewer (which needs some serious debugging)
> for Frankenstein can be found at http://www.ebookcoop.net/ebookcoop/
> (registration required, but any bogus data will do because I'm not
> yet doing any validation). So far, only seems to work on Firefox,
> and I haven't taken the time to figure out the vagaries of other
> browsers.

The viewer was just a 10 minute hack so Greg could see what files I was
wanting to upload. I'm not for one second proposing that PG uses it! A
scan versus "line synched text" viewer would be a very nice thing to
have at PG -- it would certainly save a lot of time hunting for errata
references -- but kind of a lot would have to happen before that could
become even a vague possibility.

On 2012-11-28, Greg Newby wrote:

> I'm attaching the posted message (hopefully it will pass through the
> email distribution intact).

Thanks Greg. I'll email Al and see what he wants to do.

Regards

Jon
_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d