Re: your mistake
James Adcock <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Dec 2012 17:39:18 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> If you find an error, what is the most frictionless process you can >> imagine to report back to the WWers that the error exists? If that >> process were implemented, would you use it? >Highlight, right-click, send-to. Technology hasn't caught up to my level of laziness, AFAIK. Consider the "level of technology" I use when SR'ing my own efforts on my tablet reader: Right click on problem. Select "Highlight" Enter note describing problem. Then, a week or two later when I have SR'ed to the end, I just go through my "Highlight" notes one at a time and incorporate the fixes into my source. One can imagine emailing those highlights direct to PG -- the technology already exists! Consider the example here: https://kindle.amazon.com/profile/Jason-Boog/726625 _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d