Re: Proposal for augmented structure for PG
James Adcock <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:41:02 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>Why should PG turn itself from a trusted source of books of reliable quality into a repository of every kind of crap somebody wanted to throw in? PG is NOT a trusted source of books of reliable quality but the "PG High Priesthood" believes themselves to be a trusted source of books of reliable quality, and therein lies the problem. Most PG books being read by most people fall into the "Barely Readable" "Crap" category -- your words not mine. Most could be easily fixed. But they are not being fixed. PG even refuses to count the "Crap" so therefore how could it be "fixed" -- if PG cannot or will not even recognize "Crap" when they are producing it? _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d