Re: Seeking input on "top 100" collection
Greg Newby <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Sep 2013 22:39:37 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:30:07AM -0400, Robert Cicconetti wrote: > Err.. I guess I wasn't clear. I'm not suggesting things to be included in > the 2014 top 100. I'm asking which edition is on Greg's wish list... and I > was guessing either the Cambridge or Globe. > > "If I were king, I'd order an entirely fresh set of Shakespeare, > partially based on our current items (we have four different versions > of many of Shakespeare's plays in English). Use invisible tags to > mark players, so that readers could use them for performance (for > example, have all of Hamlet's lines be highlighted). That would bring > a lot of benefit from the markup, in addition to looking a lot better > than the plain text versions we already have." > > -Bob I agree that First Folio is problematic. Otherwise, I don't have a basis for a preference. Actually, I don't even know the was used our #100 (http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/100/pg100.txt), and would be curious to know. For Shakespeare, like other plays, the main idea is to make it far easier to create custom versions for each player/part (plus stage direction). The markup mentioned above would also make it easy to have a computer-based "minus one" performance, in which a live human performer would read his parts, in the midst of a computer-generated play troup. (This type of thing is already done with MIDI and musical scores, for musical performances.) It would also make it trivial to do speaker-based text analysis or other research. More importantly, it would give us a much cleaner complete Shakespeare! -- Greg > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM, James Adcock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > *>*Volume 1 of the Cambridge went through DP and is on PG. 23041. > > > > Well, 23041 is just the index, a selection of five of plays follow. So if > > one wanted the index plus the five plays included it would require ?special > > handling.?**** > > > > And the plays (while I personally like them) are not the most famous, > > leading to the question ?Why not the most famous??**** > > > > And then one has the problem that the generated epub and kindle (mobi) for > > these plays is really pretty bad.**** > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gutvol-d mailing list > > gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] > > http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gutvol-d mailing list > gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] > http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d