Re: Quality at PG

Juliet Sutherland <[email protected]> Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:48:41 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
If no one can find a scanned version of a good edition, and wants it 
scanned from a paper version, you can send the paper version to me and 
I'll scan it and run it through DP. I do destructive scanning so you 
wouldn't get the paper version back. Please write to me off the list if 
you'd like me to do this.

JulietS

On 10/7/2013 12:32 AM, Peter Hatch wrote:
> Neither of those links are actually the British version - you can see 
> an explanation of some of the differences at 
> http://www.cesnur.org/2003/dracula/I.htm. And the one claiming to be 
> the 1897 edition seems to be based on a prior Gutenberg edition that 
> had the same erroneous claim.
>
> I've got an Elibron Classics facsimile of the sixth edition, and an 
> annotated version (by Leonard Wolf) where the text is from a facsimile 
> of the second edition, but that Constable facsimile looks considerably 
> better than either.  I'm thinking I'll pick it up and try to get it 
> scanned by one of the book scanning services - does anyone have any 
> experience with those?  Right now overnight-scanning.eu 
> <http://overnight-scanning.eu> looks the most interesting, though I'd 
> have to see if they could ship to the US.
>
> --
> Peter Hatch
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Marc D'Hooghe 
> <marcdh-80DlUI+pCEhv/[email protected] <mailto:marcdh-80DlUI+pCEhv/[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     http://www.24grammata.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Dracula-Bram-Stoker-24grammata.com_.pdf
>
>     Claims to be 1897 (british) edition - and looks like it...
>
>     Marc
>     FreeLiterature.org <http://www.freeliterature.org>
>
>
>     On 30 September 2013 03:56, James Adcock <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         >However, archive.org <http://archive.org> doesn't actually
>         have a good edition of Dracula - the Grosset & Dunlop edition
>         used is the altered American version of the text, rather than
>         the original British, as were all the other editions available
>         there last I checked.
>
>         http://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/194/dracula/
>
>         claims to be Constable & Co.  -- FWIW.
>
>         And Google Books on "dracula bram stoker Constable & Co."
>         leads to a claimed Dover reprint of Constable -- again FWIW.
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         gutvol-d mailing list
>         gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] <mailto:gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]>
>         http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     gutvol-d mailing list
>     gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] <mailto:gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]>
>     http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gutvol-d mailing list
> gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
> http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d

_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d