Re: Eric Flint on the future (was Paul Krugman holds forth on the future of publishing)
"Rob Preece" <publisher-DvA37WtpcRtyKyx0jQMQgAC/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.ebook-community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If you haven't read Eric Flint's article, you should. Flint takes a
position I see a lot--and one that makes a certain amount of sense, but
only if you start with what I think is a flawed foundation.
Basically, Flint says that piracy may kill the novel but other forms of
story-telling will survive so no harm, no foul.
He's right, of course, that other forms of story-telling will survive.
Somehow the television industry will find a way to survive (and nobody
is going to tell them no-harm-no-foul if pirates eat their lunch,
they're politically connected). So, people will always have television
to turn to.
It's interesting, though that he makes the (correct) point that the
novel really became popular with the advent of copyright, yet doesn't
extend on this. Copyright isn't something that's natural, it's a legal
entity, created by government. Given that society sees the public good
in allowing author (and by extension publisher) rights in paper format,
why wouldn't they do the same in other formats? What, after all, is so
different about a novel if you read it in paper or on a Kindle?
Yet Flint goes off on those who are concerned about piracy as if they
were proposing something unique and horrible--instead of simply looking
for a way to extend current protections to a new medium.
Flint's extended analogy to the death of the science fiction short
story is interesting but flawed. The short story didn't vanish because
it was pirated or because copyright didn't protect it, it vanished
because tastes changed. Certainly I'd be the last to argue that I
deserve a good living from writing if people don't want to read my
books. We're talking, however, about a case where readers exist, where
they are willing to pay (if required to do so to get the books they
want) and where piracy threatens not only the authors, but ultimately
the readers who will be no longer able to find new books to read.
I've got nothing against people giving away their books for free (I
even give away one of my books as a promo item to encourage people to
buy). I think the Baen Free Library is great. I love Gutenberg and am
sad that excessive copyright extension means that many books that
should be in the public domain are locked out of it. But I also think
that living authors should have a right to decide how their book is
published, and that giving away books for free should be a decision
made by authors rather than forced on them by pirates.
Rob Preece
Publisher, www.BooksForABuck.com
------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Post a message: ebook-community [[at]] *
Unsubscribe: ebook-community-unsubscribe [[at]] *
Switch to digest: ebook-community-digest [[at]] *
Switch to normal: ebook-community-normal [[at]] *
Put mail on hold: ebook-community-nomail [[at]] *
Administrator: ebook-community-owner [[at]] *
(* == yahoogroups.com)
-------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:ebook-community-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ebook-community-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/