Re: Neat summary of Google strategy
"joseph harris" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.ebook-community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <02a301c9e604$478eac40$0401a8c0@looperman9> |
From: "Bill Janssen" > Mary E Tyler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Google isn't copying your content. They are >> linking to content, aggregating those links. > > Sure they're copying (as I'm sure you know). That's how > they compute > their ranks and index your pages. I think no one's called > them on it, > though, because the Web is sort of built that way -- > there's a tacit > agreement (which some would like to abrogate) that if you > publish it on > a Web page, people are allowed to make copies for > non-commercial > personal use. You pretty much have to, to read it. > > Bill Bill makes a very important point. Technically a file is copied at every point of its journey - usually in packets, still, I believe - and is put together as a coherent copy on the recipient' hard drive. This causes a terminological confusion over the nature of what a copy is in copyright. However I have never been convinced that there is any confusion in anyone's mind that treating a copy of that sort as a source document (for their further use as though one has ownership rights) is *not* a moral act. They may receive and use - just as a print buyer may - but they have no rights to distribute that file, whether free or not. The basis of search engines is that they publish a related link to a search enquiry with a description that at one time was found in the html <title> and <description> tags. this has been extended in all sorts of ways, mainly by Google, without testing in any court and apparently without regard to the wording of the Acts involved. This is also confused by the Settlement Agreement waiting decision since this is also not before the court as an argued case, but as an agreement between parties requiring only a Judge's cursory examination. The basis of any court case is the hearing of arguments between the parties, as I am sure you know. The Google position will be clarified to some extent in this, but there is now substantial objection which the judge will have to deal with, as well as interest from US government agencies. Joseph Harris ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ Post a message: ebook-community [[at]] * Unsubscribe: ebook-community-unsubscribe [[at]] * Switch to digest: ebook-community-digest [[at]] * Switch to normal: ebook-community-normal [[at]] * Put mail on hold: ebook-community-nomail [[at]] * Administrator: ebook-community-owner [[at]] * (* == yahoogroups.com) -------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:ebook-community-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ebook-community-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/