Re: Neat summary of Google strategy
"joseph harris" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.ebook-community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <05e701c9e9c3$51555090$0401a8c0@looperman9> |
From: "Chris"
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, joseph harris wrote:
>
>> For creatives copyright is the life blood. It establishes
>> a
>> right to be rewarded for one's efforts.
>
> .. and that establishment was a creation in law, designed
> to
> satisfy the needs of both the sources and destinations of
> the
> works. The needs of both have shifted over time, and the
> old
> structures are proving to be an increasingly poor fit.
Chris,
American law is the continuation of English law, and the
Founding Fathers of the US were English (colonial)
gentlemen. The history of copyright was not of sudden
imposition, but of release from the time of the
establishemnt of the Church of England. The Act of Queen
Anne was nearly a hundred years befor the Declaration of
Independence. This took the (Crown) monopoly away from the
printers and started the sharing process with the creators.
It is probably significant that neither Thomas Paine nor
they objected to the idea of creatives controlling spread of
their works - indeed they seemed to wish for an expansion.
>
>> Many are employed, one way or another, in serving this
>> industry
>> that makes the rewards real - or at least in prospect.
>
> As many auto industry employees are finding, nothing lasts
> forever, no matter how big and important it may seem.
Interesting analogy; however you are writing of the American
car industry. There are differing experiences round the
world, and basic organisation for a capital intensive
industry is unlikely to change. The problem is demand for
cars, not the way they are made or sold. Correction is about
how decision-making is conducted. the type of car is a
social matter, not so much an industry one.
>
>> I do not see how this would work for a vibrant culture if
>> it
>> were removed or undermined.
>
> Fortunately, just because neither you nor I see how a
> vibrant
> culture could work without copyright does not make it
> impossible.
>
>
> : chris smith
> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> : nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecunia possit -
> cicero :
>
You ask for a leap of faith. For those creatives and others
in the industry it asks a great deal, just so a limited
number can feel moral while taking what is not theirs.
Joseph Harris
------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Post a message: ebook-community [[at]] *
Unsubscribe: ebook-community-unsubscribe [[at]] *
Switch to digest: ebook-community-digest [[at]] *
Switch to normal: ebook-community-normal [[at]] *
Put mail on hold: ebook-community-nomail [[at]] *
Administrator: ebook-community-owner [[at]] *
(* == yahoogroups.com)
-------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:ebook-community-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ebook-community-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/