Re: Re: will everyone concerned about copyright please read this
Lee Passey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.ebook-community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/20/2011 3:18 PM, Brenna Lyons wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Lee Passey<[email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> On Tue, September 20, 2011 2:02 pm, Brenna Lyons wrote: >> >>> If an author creates a world and >>> characters, he or she may still be writing in that world 20 years >>> later. He or she may be setting up gaming rights or movie rights near >>> the end of that time period, based on the audience built over decades >>> of writing in it. ... writers often continue to work in the created world, >>> with the same or connected characters, etc. >> Why can these concerns not be addressed by proper application of trademark >> law? There are lots of tools in the law's toolbelt -- its seems a bit >> ineffective to me to insist on using a crescent wrench to hammer on this >> particular nail. >> > Trademark what? Each individual world term, main character name, list of > alien laws, etc.? Do you have any concept how expensive and daunting that > would be? Yes, I think I do. If I recall my coursework correctly, trademarks are established through use, not registration. In fact, if you register a trademark and then do not use it to promote or identify your trade, the registration has no effect. Moreover, registration is not a prerequisite to a valid trademark. There /are/ some advantages to Federal registration, but I don't think any of them are applicable here. I think it is actually more common for trademark /not/ to be registered than to /be/ registered. Look around you. Every time you see a little (TM) what you're seeing is someone saying "I claim this word or phrase as my trademark, but I probably haven't registered it." The circle(R) (®) means "I've registered this trademark." Which do you think is more common? My recollection is a little fuzzy on this, but I don't think you even have to mark a trademark or trade name as such. If you use a word or phrase in such a way that it makes it clear that it /is/ a trademark, that is sufficient. Check with your own counsel, but I believe that if you added a phrase in your book to the effect that "all invented names and situations in this book are trademarks of Brenna Lyons," that that would be sufficient to claim a trademark in all of those things. Now of course a /claim/ of trademark does not automatically give you one. To enforce a claim you must show that someone else's use is likely to cause confusion in the market place, and that you were the first in the market. If a name is purely descriptive "e.g. Black Pots" it doesn't carry much strength. If it is completely fanciful "e.g. Cortugny Pots" it is a very strong trademark. This "confusion in the market place" test is one of the reasons that, for your purposes, trademark is probably a better strategy than copyright. No matter how hard she tries, J.K. Rowling cannot copyright the name Harry Potter. The names are common, and putting them together surely does not rise to the level of creativity required of copyright. Harry Potter as the name for a boy wizard is an idea, not an expression, and is therefore not copyrightable. But Harry Potter as the name for a boy wizard is clearly trademarked as there would be confusion in the market place if anyone else tried to use it. What's more, some other name which is similar is also protected by the trade mark if it is similar enough to cause confusion in the marketplace. So J.K. might also be able to stop the use of "Henry Peters, boy wizard" or perhaps even "Henrietta Porter, girl wizard." To my knowledge, trademarks never expire, so long as they continue to be actively used to identify a specific tradesperson. If I were counsel for that gaming company that is creating a game based on your Great American Novel, I'd be counseling them very hard to get an assignment of all your trademarks, as from a business perspective they are far more valuable that any copyrights. If I were your counsel I would recommend that you stick to your story that an assignment of copyright is the only thing they need, because from a business perspective the trademarks are far more valuable, and you want to keep us much value for yourself as you can. ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ Post a message: ebook-community [[at]] * Unsubscribe: ebook-community-unsubscribe [[at]] * Switch to digest: ebook-community-digest [[at]] * Switch to normal: ebook-community-normal [[at]] * Put mail on hold: ebook-community-nomail [[at]] * Administrator: ebook-community-owner [[at]] * (* == yahoogroups.com) -------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] ebook-community-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ebook-community-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/