Re: Re: concern at copyright ruling
Robotech_Master <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.ebook-community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMVHC7UqZ64SpkUCp6Ukw_LXP-5tE6-ASDZHNeAj8fa3r=x-OQ@mail.gmail.com> |
It would also mean that publishers could kill off future used book sales by moving their printing operations overseas, which would cost American jobs and incur a lot of extra shipping costs. Which is really kind of ridiculous. On 3/21/13, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it is worth noting that the particulars of this case do not > represent > the foreign publisher shipping crates of books to a U.S. bookstore. In this > > case, individuals bought the books in Thailand, and at that point, exhausted > > the publisher's control over distribution. These books were already > legitimately sold once - the triggering point in the first sale doctrine. > > Essentially, Wiley was asking for a block on used books that originated > outside > the U.S. To establish that as part of copyright would have meant sweeping > changes for how books get resold would be read into copyright law, and that > was > something the court could not countenance. It would mean that if, as a > traveller, you visited a foreign country and bought a book, you could not > pass > it on to anyone when you returned to the U.S. The difference between that > and > what Kirtsaeng was doing is a difference in scale only. > > Note that the ruling only says that publisher's will find it "more difficult > to > charge different prices for the same book in different geographic markets". > It > does not say that it will be impossible, or that it is not allowed. It > appears > to me that this control would have to rest within contract law, not within > copyright law. > > ... Chris > > (thank you for including the link to the decision - more people should take > the > time to read these before commenting) > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, josephHarris wrote: > >> I'd been following the reasoning in the majority decision without too >> much problem, but that did not last. >> http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-697_d1o2.pdf >> >> "Third, Wiley and the dissent claim that a nongeographical >> interpretation will make it difficult, perhaps impossible, for >> publishers (and other copyright holders) to divide foreign and domestic >> markets. We concede that is so. A publisher may find it more difficult >> to charge different prices for the same book in different geographic >> markets. But we do not see how these facts help Wiley, for we can find >> no basic principle of copyright law that suggests that publishers are >> especially entitled to such rights". [p31 of the majority ruling] >> >> I cannot see why there needs to be explicit consent in the Acts, if >> there is control of copies. If control of copies does not include >> control of price is not control lost, or at least weakened? >> >> I am at least on the same page as Justice Ginsberg >> >> "Cite as: 568 U. S. ____ (2013) 33 GINSBURG, J., dissenting 8--184.34 to >> 8--184.35; 2 Goldstein §7.6.1.2(a), at 7:141; 4 Patry §§13:22, 13:44, >> 13:44.10. [JUSTICE GINSBURG, with whom JUSTICE KENNEDY joins, and with >> whom JUSTICE SCALIA joins except as to Parts III and V--B--1, >> dissenting.] >> "Rather than adopting the very international-exhaustion rule the United >> States has consistently resisted in international-trade negotiations, I >> would adhere to the national-exhaustion framework set by the Copyright >> Act's text and history. Under that regime, codified in §602(a)(1), >> Kirtsaeng's unauthorized importation of the foreign-made textbooks >> involved in this case infringed Wiley's copyrights. I would therefore >> affirm the Second Circuit's judgment." [p33 of the Dissent] >> >> I am personally relieved that the point I immediately picked up here is >> both conceded in the majority ruling and underlined by the dissenting >> opinion. :-) > > : chris smith :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > : nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecunia possit - cicero : > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Post a message: ebook-community [[at]] * > Unsubscribe: ebook-community-unsubscribe [[at]] * > Switch to digest: ebook-community-digest [[at]] * > Switch to normal: ebook-community-normal [[at]] * > Put mail on hold: ebook-community-nomail [[at]] * > Administrator: ebook-community-owner [[at]] * > > (* == yahoogroups.com) > -------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- Chris Meadows aka | WWW: http://www.terrania.us | Somebody Robotech_Master | ICQ: 5477383 AIM: RoboMastr | help, I'm [email protected] | Skype, LJ-Gizmo: Robotech_Master | trapped in [email protected] | Facebook: Robotech.Master | a sig file! ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ Post a message: ebook-community [[at]] * Unsubscribe: ebook-community-unsubscribe [[at]] * Switch to digest: ebook-community-digest [[at]] * Switch to normal: ebook-community-normal [[at]] * Put mail on hold: ebook-community-nomail [[at]] * Administrator: ebook-community-owner [[at]] * (* == yahoogroups.com) -------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] ebook-community-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ebook-community-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/