Re: How Book Publishers Can Beat Amazon
"Robotech_Master [email protected] [ebook-community]" <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:10:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.ebook-community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMVHC7Wkg_cgFqBvPFNOKW5Y4+yoiuDjjiaKK39MGU7EjYMtNw@mail.gmail.com> |
There's just the wee little wrinkle that volume discounts are a legal defense to Robinson-Patman accusations. And if you can demonstrate to me a book retailer who moves more volume than Amazon, I'll eat my hat. From http://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/price-discrimination-robinson-patman Q: I operate two stores that sell compact discs. My business is being ruined by giant discount chains that sell their products for less than my wholesale cost. What can I do? A: Discount chains may be able to buy compact discs at a lower wholesale price because it costs the manufacturer less, on a per-unit basis, to deal with large-volume customers. If so, the manufacturer may have a "cost justification" defense to the differential pricing and the policy would not violate the Robinson-Patman Act. On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:05 AM, josephHarris joe9438-/[email protected] [ebook-community] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Chris, > > You are spot on, of course, with that comment. But there is more to it > with Amazon. I've now understood the purpose of the Robinson-Patman Act in > the US, which has been ignored. This article discusses it: > http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/6/amazon-books-hachetteantitrustbusiness.html > . > > That doesn't alter the distribution point you soundly make. But that is > also why no single company should be permitted to concentrate distribution > into itself. Another law area ignored with Amazon [and maybe Google] seems > to be the anti-trust one. > > Joseph > > > On 02/06/2014 21:36, 'Chris Smith' [email protected] [ebook-community] wrote: > > > > > So publishers want to sell something in return for money? Welcome to > Retailing Business 101. > > It's been like this for a very, very, long time - but maybe just not for > publishers. > > http://www.fastcompany.com/47593/wal-mart-you-dont-know > > What I saw in your article was publishing companies that seem to have > skipped over the lesson about diversifying their distribution, and the > risks of not doing so. Fixing that has always been something within their > control. > > josephHarris joe9438-/[email protected] [ebook-community] wrote: > > > > How Book Publishers Can Beat Amazon > > > > By BOB KOHNMAY 30, 2014 > > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/31/opinion/how-book-publishers-can-beat-amazon.html > > > > "But there was a problem. When a company has dominant market power and > > sells goods for below marginal cost, it is engaging in predatory > > pricing, a violation of federal antitrust laws" > > > > "All was well until the Justice Department, supported by a white paper > > supplied to it by Amazon, filed an ill-advised lawsuit against Apple and > > five of the major book publishers for antitrust violations." > > > > In tune with my comments over the past few years on these topics. > > > > Joseph Harris > > > > > > -- Chris Meadows aka | WWW: http://www.terrania.us | Somebody Robotech_Master | ICQ: 5477383 AIM: RoboMastr | help, I'm [email protected] | Skype, LJ-Gizmo: Robotech_Master | trapped in [email protected] | Facebook: Robotech.Master | a sig file!