http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/faq.html has changed as at 0401 UTC, 2006-06-12.
Doctor Fun website changes <dr-fun-changes-rm8PX32fqvbMZ2x0e22RKNi2O/[email protected]> Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:01:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.humour.dr-fun.changes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============0863195435== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Latest changes to http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/ _______________________________________________ --===============0863195435== 3c3 < The Story Of Doctor Fun --- > Welcome to the Doctor Fun Page 5,1357c5,36 < Slightly updated, June 2005. Most important news is the Doctor < Fun Book, from Plan Nine Publishing. 128 pages, full color, < all your favorite Doctor Fun cartoons. Already in its third < printing! < < The Doctor Fun Book from Plan Nine Publishing < < Well, I promised to write it, and here it is, the story of < Doctor Fun. It's not as finished as it ought to be, and I plan < to add some stuff, sometime. It's been six or seven years < since I wrote an FAQ, and the last one was sort of terse. Like < all good procrastinators, I've worked on this right up to the < last minute. Broken links, spelling and grammatical errors < will be fixed as I find them. < < All the best FAQs are written as long chatty mostly-text < messages that you can print off (duplex to save paper, please) < and take to the go-go bar to peruse between lap dances. I've < kept links to other things to a minimum in this, although < partly that's because this isn't quite finished yet. I've < written answers to questions I think ought to be in an FAQ, < and answers to questions people have actually asked me. I've < made some notes where I intended to write more and ran out of < time on this version. Ask me some more questions, and I'll < write some more answers. Most of the FAQs I read have to do < with CD-writers or how to read the stepping series on Intel < chips. You know, useful stuff. I dunno what sort of useful < stuff you'll find here. < < Somewhere out there floating around in Internet Land is a < sort-of FAQ I wrote in a shameless attempt to get some kind of < prize for something shortly after Doctor Fun started. It used < to be on Google, but I couldn't find it the last time I < looked. I don't have a copy, but will post it here if I find < one. It's probably a better record of what was on my mind when < I started Doctor Fun than this will be. < < The mini-FAQ on the main Doctor Fun page was written after I < wrote most of this, and is shorter and funnier. This page is < longer, and has more run-on sentences. < < Now, before anything else, some acknowledgments. I write and < draw Doctor Fun all by my lonesome, and like it that way, but < these people have contributed a feature or two to the Doctor < Fun page and deserve to get their name on the marquee. What < they did is explained somewhere else in the FAQ. Paul Jones < and the jolly crew at ibiblio, Nicholas Barnard, Mostafa < Eldefrawy, Nick Kean, Jack Leblond, Mark Plaga, Ed Staszny, < Keith Waclena, Dr. Bernhard L. Winkler, Australian Cybermalls, < and whoever maintains the mirror at Manchester University < (can't find your e-mail). < _________________________________________________________ < < What is Doctor Fun? < < Doctor Fun is a cartoon, single-panel, with a wacky gag and < colorful artwork. Not all Doctor Funs may be suitable for < children and some childlike adults. There's a new Doctor Fun < every weekday. What Doctor Fun is, for the literal-minded, is < a 640 x 480 pixel 24-bit color JPEG file. < < Is Doctor Fun an alternative comic? < < Doctor Fun is something, but it's not an alternative comic. I < made the mistake once of sending some Doctor Funs to some < alternative newspapers. < < Where and when did Doctor Fun start? < < Doctor Fun first went live on the web on September 24, 1993 at < the University of Chicago Library on a server called < neuromancer.lib.uchicago.edu . For a brief time, Doctor Fun < was also available on, of all things, a web server running < under Windows for Workgroups on a machine called < microserver.lib.uchicago.edu. Neither of these computers are < now serving up Doctor Fun. < < Is Doctor Fun the oldest comic on the Internet? < < No. That would be "Where the Buffalo Roam" by Hans Bjordahl. < "Where the Buffalo Roam" started in 1991, and had its own < Usenet group long before Doctor Fun came along, and is still < running on the web. < < Was Doctor Fun the first cartoon on the World Wide Web? < < There you go! You've got it - Doctor Fun was the first cartoon < on the World Wide Web. < < Here's the announcement from NCSA. (Of course, that link to < the cartoon doesn't go anywhere now.) < < Marc Andreesen noted that it was still running a month later. < Marc also sent me the first e-mail about Doctor Fun, pointing < out a typo in my links (historic e-mail I wish I could find < now - whatever happened to my billion dollars?) < < Who is the Godfather of Doctor Fun? < < Keith Waclena first suggested I put Doctor Fun on this new < "World Wide Web" thing, and gave me a space on his new "web < server". Keith is the Godfather of Doctor Fun. Some say the < guy with the ponytail in this cartoon is Keith, but it < couldn't be Keith, because the character in the cartoon is < wearing a tie, and Keith never wears ties. Keith says "Happy < New Year", sends his regrets that he wasn't at the party, and < asks you to decide. < < So Doctor Fun didn't start out as a web cartoon? < < The proto-version of Doctor Fun started out as a cartoon I was < going to post to one of the binaries groups on Usenet. I spent < an awful lot of time trying to balance quality while cramming < down the size of the cartoon. Doctor Fun was posted to Usenet < for many years, and there is still a mailing list that will < send you the new Doctor Fun each weekday. < < Here is a test drawing left over from when I was trying out < different formats. < < And here is the announcement of Doctor Fun dredged out of < Deja. < < An even more proto-version of Doctor Fun started out as a < photocopied 'zine I was going to distribute myself here in < Chicago before I even got on the Internet. I have that < somewhere, and might scan it in someday, although most of the < cartoons have already been re-used as early Doctor Funs. I < don't think more than ten copies ever got passed out. Gosh, if < you had one of those, that would be really valuable! < < What is ibiblio? < < ibiblio is the public's library and digital archive, and is < physically located at the University of North Carolina, in < Chapel Hill. There are all sorts of interesting things on < ibiblio. Why not check it out? < < How did Doctor Fun end up on ibiblio? And what why did it move < from SunSITE to metalab and then to ibiblio? < < The short answer is, Doctor Fun never moved anywhere after it < left the University of Chicago, SunSITE just became metalab < which became ibiblio. < < Since I am sitting here pretending real people are asking me < these questions instead of my imaginary friends, a more < interesting question is, how did Doctor Fun move to SunSITE to < begin with? There was a collection of artists called SITO (I < forget what it stands for) on SunSITE. SITO was maintained by < somebody named Ed Staszny. Ed saw my cartoons and contacted me < to ask if I'd like to move Doctor Fun to my own space on < SunSITE. This was very kind of Ed, and for other reasons I had < to get the cartoons off of neuromancer anyway, so everything < worked out. Unfortunately, Doctor Fun sort of swamped SITO, so < the SunSITE people decided to move me off to my own space all < by myself. And I've been there ever since, and so have many of < the people who were at SunSITE at the time, like Paul Jones, < and Jonathan Magid. < < What is the deal with the ibiblio, etc., name changes? < < I didn't really know the answer, either, so I put the question < to ibiblio's Director, Paul Jones, and he was kind enough to < take the time to explain all. < < "Here's the short: Pre-1992 we were a collection of projects < including a bbs service called launchpad.unc.edu. In 1992 we < received funding and support from Sun Microcomputing Systems < for a joint project to be called sunsite.unc.edu or Sun < Software, Information and Technology Exchange. In 1998 Sun < decided to revisit our funding and support arrangement and we < mutually decided that conditions were not favorable for < continuing on as sunsite so we became Metalab to reflect our < new collection of sponsors instead of one major one. In 2000 < we entered into a partnership with the Center for the Public < Domain (known as the Red Hat Center at that time). to < highlight this major new involvement, we took a new name (at < their suggestion) of ibiblio.org today that's who we are, but < we still answer to sunsite.unc.edu and metalab.unc.edu." < < Wait, there's more. Mike Molloy wrote in to remind me that < "SITO" used to be called "OTIS", and they changed their name, < too. I've still got an entry on their pages. < < Why is there no Doctor Fun domain name? < < I've thought about it, but I like ibiblio, and I like being < associated with ibiblio. They're nice people. One day I hope < to make a pilgrimage to the clean and well-lighted ibiblio < offices. < < Can you have advertisements on ibiblio? < < No, but I'm not constrained from pursuing commercial < opportunities for Doctor Fun, as long as it isn't taking place < on ibiblio. < < Is Doctor Fun copyright? < < Yes. Feel free to link to Doctor Fun, send it to your friends, < send it to your enemies, print it out and use it for toilet < paper (use the glossy photo paper so you really clog the < toilet) or tape it to your door. But anything beyond personal < use I'd appreciate it if you'd contact me. You can use all < those file names that never change to always link to the < latest cartoon, the latest logo, the latest thumbnails, the < latest week, and all that which has been made E-Z 4 U 2 link < 2. Most people are pretty nice about asking, and in return, < I'm pretty nice back. Otherwise... < < Why don't you release Doctor Fun under the GNU General License < or copyleft? < < That's an interesting idea, but I don't think it works well < for cartoons, or, at least, this sort of cartoon. I think I've < been progressive enough about letting Doctor Fun go all over < the Internet, but I still write it, and draw it, so the < copyright stays with me. It's my precious! It's mine! It < belongs to me! < < Who pays for all that bandwidth, cartoon boy? < < I don't know nuthin' about that! I just draw the cartoons. < < Where can I get the latest Doctor Fun cartoon? < < You can always get the latest Doctor Fun cartoon from this < link. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/latest.jpg < < You can always get a little thumbnail of (only the artwork) < the latest cartoon from this link. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/thumb.jpg < < Where can I see the Doctor Fun cartoons from this week? < < You can always see the latest Doctor Fun cartoons for this < week from this link. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/this-week.html < < Are all of the old Doctor Fun cartoons and logos available? < < All the old cartoons and logos can be browsed in the archive < page, from this link. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/archive.html < < Are there any other fun stuff on the Doctor Fun Page? < < I've put a bunch of pre-Doctor Fun scanned cartoons online. I < plan to add more as I have time. Usually I put "new" old < material online when I take breaks. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/books.htm < < You can get an old week of Doctor Fun, or maybe sometimes a < page from the collection of older scanned cartoons, from this < link. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/old-week.html < < Which cartoons get the most hits? < < Here are some popular ones. This is the same list from the < main page. < * Here's the one about Barney. < * Here's the one about beavers. < * Here's the one about gerbils. < * Here's the one about tribbles. < * Here's the one about wasabi. < * Here's the one about vasectomies. < * Here's the one about Clusenix. < * Here's the one about Usenet. < * Here's the one about Don Knuth. (I don't know if he's seen < it.) < * Here's the one about The Incredible Hulk. (I don't know if < he's seen it, either.) < < Which Doctor Fun cartoons do you like? < < Here's another list. Some I like because I thought they were < funny, and some like because I thought they were well-drawn. < And some I like because I thought they were both funny and < well-drawn. This is also the same list from the main page. < Only here I've added at least brief annotations. I'd like to < add a list of Doctor Funs I don't like, too. It's only fair. < * Here's the one about the donuts. (Thought it was funny.) < * Here's the one about Godzilla. (I always use this as a < test print image - hardly any printer gets those < out-of-gamut colors right.) < * Here's the one about the chickens. (I could draw this one < a thousand more times, and I would never get that < chicken's head as good as it already is.) < * Here's the one about the human cannonball. (The clown is < concerned.) < * Here's the one about Mr. Spock. (Thought it was funny and < well-drawn.) < * Here's the one about the sperm. (Thought it was < well-drawn.) < * Here's the one about the protozoa. (Thought it was funny < and well-drawn.) < * Here's the one about the blow-up doll. (This is an old one < I redrew for Doctor Fun.) < * Pick this one! (Another old one that pre-dated Doctor < Fun.) < * Here's the one about the squirrel. (Thought it was funny, < and I like those Christmas lights.) < * Here's the one about the ice cream cones. (How you draw an < ice cream cone skeleton?) < * Here's the one about the pinatas. (Thought it was funny.) < * Here's the one about the deathray. (In this one, the < artwork escapes into the frame of the cartoon.) < * Here's the one about the elephants. (Thought it was < funny.) < * Here's the one about tomatillos. (Drew this after I was < sent to the store for tomatillos and came back with < something else.) < * Here's the one about watering the plants. (Remember to < hydrate. Shadows came out good.) < * Here's the one about the tapeworms. (Thought it was funny, < and well-drawn.) < * Here's the one about the Zamboni. (Liked those scorch < marks.) < * Here's the one about the operating room. (Thought it was < funny.) < * Here's the one about the goldfish. (Ditto.) < * Here's another one about squirrels.(Ditto.) < * Here's the one about Gumby. (Nice plastic-looking blood.) < * Here's the one about Santa. (Thought it was well-drawn, I < think.) < * Here's another one about chickens. (The water came out < nice.) < * Here's the one about Mr. Potato Head. (Thought it was < well-drawn.) < * Here's the one about the weasels. (Thought it was funny.) < * Here's the one about the Titanic. (I thought it was funny, < but a lot of people didn't get this one. Liked the < particles floating in the water.) < * Here's the one about the Muppets. (Thought it was funny, < and well-drawn.) < * Here's the one about the pickles. (Had to draw it.) < * Here's the one about Vlad the Impaler. (Thought it was < funny.) < * Here's the one about carrots. (Thought it was funny.) < * Here's the one about Rear Window. (Look at the fine < detail! Look at those pimples!) < * Here's the one about the fleas. (Thought this one ) < * Here's the one about the Enchanted Forest. (Thought it was < funny.) < * Here's the one about Steely Dan. (Liked how it turned out, < but I had every line of the lyrics wrong when I first < sketched it.) < * Here's the one about the Amish. (Thought it was funny.) < * Here's the one about noses. (Thought it was funny.) < * Here's the one about Mister Clean. (Thought it was funny.) < * Here's the one about Harry Potter. (I couldn't care less < about Harry Potter, but "The Long Good Friday" is the best < gangster movie ever, "Godfather" included. This cartoon < was in the middle of a whole series about Easter peeps.) < * Here's the one about the chipmunk. (Maybe more cute than < funny.) < * Here's the one about the polar bear. (Liked the whale < better than the bear, actually.) < * Here's the one about Ultraman. (His suit came out nice.) < < What's the deal with the logo? < < The explanation on the main page is funnier than this one. The < logo started as an afterthought, and has just sort of stumbled < on through the years. Remember, the original idea was to post < the cartoons on Usenet. Thus, there was no reason for a logo. < But when I started setting up the web page, I thought it < needed something graphical, and the cartoon itself was a < little too big. I wanted a page with a link to the daily < cartoon, plus all the other stuff (archives, the faq I never < wrote, etc.) So I came up with a little picture of a dog < wearing a lab coat - voila! Doctor Fun. After a couple weeks I < got bored looking at the first one, so I drew another one. < Then I decided to keep changing it every couple weeks. Then it < just kept getting fancier and fancier. There was a long < period, starting around the United Media time, when the logo < changed infrequently. When I started the cartoon after my long < break, I decided to change it every two weeks, but I'm not < locked into it - sometimes (not very often) it's sooner, < sometimes it's later. The logos are fun because they can be < kind of artsy and obscure without really having any punchline < (some would claim the same about the cartoons). < < One of the problems, or so editors and other cartoonists have < told me, with single-panel gag cartoons like Doctor Fun, is < that they have no central characters for people to somehow < latch onto and "love", which would then make them want to buy < things with the character on it. So there you go. Sadly, the < logo gets the least amount of traffic compared to everything < else, and the low number of hits on the smaller logo image < means few readers actually access Doctor Fun through the main < page. < < I recall as I write this that the earliest web browsers had < inline GIF support, but not inline JPEG support. The cartoon < was a JPEG, so it originally popped up in an external viewer. < The logos are now in JPEG, too. < < Who is the dog in the logo? < < Some people think he's an aardvark, but he isn't. If people < really press me about it, I tell them he's a Charlie, because < he's loosely based on my parent's dog, Charlie. Charlie isn't < around anymore. He lived to be 17 and died a couple years ago. < Here's a picture of Charlie. Charlie appeared in at least one < of the break messages, and even made it into the logo. < < The new dog is Maddie. < < Aren't there a bunch of references to a variety of things in < the logos? < < Sure - that's the fun part: movies, musicians, books, beer, < you-name-it. Some are overt, some are not. Some took a lot of < work, and some were slapped together late at night. < < I was going to list all the references, but I think for now < I'll just drop in clues for the music ones: Björk, Scott < Joplin, Pink Floyd, ZZ Top, Elvis Costello, The Clash, Lloyd < Cole, B-52s, Toad the Wet Sprocket, The Smiths, The Beatles, < U2, maybe more. < < Some themes have been parodied more than once, but I follow < the "Royko Rule" and retire a logo theme once it's been around < twice (I'll probably break it, eventually, for Björk). < < You can always get the latest logo from this link. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/logo.jpg < < You can get the smaller version, too. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/logo-small.jpg < < And a thumbnail. < < http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/thumbl.jpg < < Can I search Doctor Fun? < < You can search the Doctor Fun captions two different ways: < < Jack Leblond at Net Smart Incorporated, has kindly provided a < mirror for Doctor Fun in the form of a search engine. You can < also get a random Doctor Fun cartoon at Jack's page. Have fun. < < Mark Plaga has created another Doctor Fun search page. Mark's < page will display a slide show of cartoons after you make your < search. Have more fun. < < It would be great if I could search more than the captions. < < Yes. It would be great, and it's all my fault that it's not < greater. Mark already did a lot of work on it, and it's up to < me to get some of the info in there. I'd like to add metadata < someday to the html pages so anyone can extra info if they < want to. < < I thought I saw some Doctor Fun postcards. Are there Doctor < Fun postcards? < < There might be. Recycled Paper Products bought some one-off < licenses to print some Doctor Fun cartoons on postcards a < couple years ago. They may still be selling them; I used to < see them in one card shop in Water Tower Place in Chicago, but < haven't looked for quite awhile. RPP and I didn't continue < with this because I wasn't really interested in selling them < off on a one-time basis, and they didn't see it as worth < anything more than that. I don't make any money off of them, < but that shouldn't keep you from buying them if you find some. < < I thought I saw some Doctor Fun electronic postcards. Are < there Doctor Fun electronic postcards? < < You can send a smaller version of a selected number of Doctor < Fun cartoons as an electronic postcard at Toonogram, sponsored < by Cyber Loft. < < Toonogram is provided courtesy of Mostafa Eldefrawy, who did < all of the work. Mostafa was also kind enough to give me the < code to turn any Doctor Fun into a Toonogram, which I will do < someday. < < Is there a Doctor Fun mailing list? < < You can receive the latest Doctor Fun cartoon in your e-mail < by joining Nicholas Barnard's Doctor Fun Mailing List. < < Are there other Doctor Fun mirror sites? < < These Doctor Fun mirrors might be closer to you than ibiblio. < This list is new and improved because the cartoons on these < sites actually update. There used to be more mirrors. If you < know of a mirror that isn't on this list, or want to be a < mirror, drop me a line. < < If you want to mirror Doctor Fun, mirror as much, or as < little, as you want. All I ask is that you give proper credit, < and not reformat or edit the cartoons. < * Australia - Today's Doctor Fun and The Doctor Fun Page < from Australian Cybermalls. (Their page only updates the < latest cartoons, and has sophisticated features not found < here. Somebody's on the ball there, too, because they've < been going on and on about this very faq ever since I < announced I was writing it. They claim to run Doctor Fun < "competitions", although I've never actually caught them < at it.) < * Great Britain - Today's Doctor Fun and The Doctor Fun Page < from Manchester. < < How can I get in touch with you? < < You can reach me at [email protected] < < How many people read Doctor Fun? < < A lot. Hardly anybody. I don't have an exact answer because I < only get statistics from ibiblio. Lots of people look at < Doctor Fun, or hardly anybody looks at Doctor Fun, depending < on how you look at the stats. There were a little over a < million downloads of the daily cartoon last year and the year < before from ibiblio. Over long periods of time readership is < slowly going up, but it's inconsistent from month to month. On < the average, it works out to about 4,000 daily readers on < ibiblio. In slightly more detail, there were a little over 12 < million hits total on the Doctor Fun pages in 2001. Of those < 12 million hits, about 7 million were for the thumbnail < images. Discounting the million downloads from latest cartoon < itself, that leaves about 4 million leftover hits, a good bulk < of which are downloads of older cartoons in the archives. It's < hard to get a handle on total readership, since some people < only look at the thumbnails, and the mirrors are just out < there somewhere doing their thing. Overall traffic simply < grows the more cartoons I add. There is a lot of crawling < through the archives. Some of it is robots, but not all of it. < Looking at the randomness of the numbers, it seems that < someone, somewhere looks at every cartoon in the archive every < week. < < There a surprising amount (to me, anyway) of traffic in the < older scanned cartoons. < < That doesn't sound so bad. It's fun to tell people millions, < if they ever ask, or even if they don't. Doesn't a million < sound good? But I don't have anything else to compare it to, < so it's hard to tell what's good. Every other cartoon I've < heard about on the Internet supposedly gets hundreds of < thousands of hits a day, so Doctor Fun may actually be the < most unpopular cartoon out there. < < Has Doctor Fun ever been slashdotted? < < A couple times, but never as the main story. Going by the last < time it happened, being mentioned on slashdot adds about < 10,000 hits for the day. < < Here's a recent mention. < < Why do most of the files end in .htm and a few end in .html? < < A question recently sent in by an actual reader like you! Most < of the files are in .htm because I used to write and test the < whole site on a DOS box first, which only allowed three-letter < file extensions. The .html files were created with symbolic < links or edited on what is now ibiblio. None of this matters < anymore, but things remain the way they are because that's how < they are. < < What kind of people read Doctor Fun? < < Based on the e-mail I get, people my age, and mostly in the < same kinds of work. But I also get a disproportionate amount < of e-mail from nurses wanting to use the cartoons ("laughter, < the best medicine...") < < Who is the Greatest Doctor Fun Fan? < < A sad story. There actually is someone I crowned the Greatest < Doctor Fun Fan, after they e-mailed me that they had < downloaded something like two years worth of cartoons over a < 14.4K modem. Unfortunately I can't find the e-mail or the old < pages. I do know they were at the University of Waterloo, in < Ontario. If you were that person, e-mail me, and claim your < rightful title on this page. < < But is it not possible that there could be more than one < Greatest Doctor Fun Fan? Why not, I say? If you have performed < a feat of strength involving Doctor Fun that doesn't cause you < or anyone else physical or (much) mental distress, send me the < details, and I will consider you, and the story of your feat < of strength, for an ever-growing list of Doctor Fun's Pantheon < of Immortals, to be added here. There are no rules, other than < what I just said. Pictures would be good, too. These stunts < will not involve me. < < Curiously, Australian Cybermalls seems to have their own list < already, but I'm not sure what it's all about. < < Where do people read Doctor Fun? < < There are readers everywhere english is the primary language, < and some places where it isn't. Doctor Fun seems to be very < popular in Scandanavia, and also Germany. None of this < information was collected very scientifically. < < Do any famous people read Doctor Fun? < < Not that I know of, except when somebody I know showed it to < someone famous. Hugh Hefner saw it. (Peggy Wilkins showed it < to him.) Bill Gates received a Doctor Fun cake (not in the < face), of all things, one time, but I hardly had anything to < do with it. If you are famous, and you read Doctor Fun, let me < know and I'll start a list here. < < Are you famous? < < I am not famous. Most people never heard of Doctor Fun and < wouldn't read it if they did. My brief brush with fame was < about a year after the cartoon started when I was invited down < to UIUC to give a lecture (about Doctor Fun!) to the local < chapter of the Association for Computing Machinery. (For those < you who are confused, the ACM is people who work with < computing machinery, not a bunch of computing machinery that < formed an association.) They gave me a t-shirt and a chinese < dinner. Later I found out they tried to get Scott Adams first, < but he wanted a wad of money, hookers and booze (I'm lying < about two of those things). I'm a cheap date (boring, too - < plus I smell bad, also I don't have a car). < < I don't do much of anything interesting, other than draw this < cartoon. I've thought that it would work well if I could get < some famous person to pose as the author of Doctor Fun. < Suddenly the cartoon would have an entirely new dimension, < without either me or the famous person having to do anything. < < Has Doctor Fun gotten any publicity? < < Doctor Fun was mentioned in the New York Times once, and in < Wired (I think). I once saw a logo flashed on the screen < during an Internet story on the local NBC affiliate. (I sent < them an e-mail, but they never wrote back.) It was mentioned < in a bunch of magazines in languages I can't read, but which < people were kind enough to send me a copy. < < Do you get a lot of e-mail? < < A steady amount, but not too much at once. I get so much < work-related e-mail, and spam, that the Doctor Fun stuff < sometimes gets lost in the shuffle, but I try to answer it < all. It's mostly been nice e-mail. < < I sent you an e-mail and you never answered it. < < Probably I never got it, or I got it and lost it, or it was < something obnoxious, and you weren't expecting an answer < anyway. If it wasn't the latter, why don't you send it again? < < The older cartoons have your e-mail address listed at < tezcat.com. I sent you mail there and it bounced. What is < tezcat.com? < < Tezcat.com was a good local Internet service provider in < Chicago. Unfortunately, it is no more. < < Here is their RIP. < < The other addresses on the older cartoons probably still work, < but I'd prefer [email protected] < < What's the most frequent e-mail question? < < Are there any Doctor Fun books? < < Why, yes. The first Doctor Fun book is available from Plan < Nine Publishing. 128 colorful pages of all the very best < Doctor Fun cartoons, which means the ones you asked for, and < the ones that get the most traffic and attention. < < Who bought the first copy? < < A deranged fan. < < What kind of weird questions do you get? < < Well, other than that question, for awhile once I was getting < lots of questions about body piercing. I think somebody had a < link to a Doctor Fun cartoon on a body piercing web site, but < I never got to the bottom of it. (I don't have any body < piercings - sorry.) There was an exchange once that started to < sound like the person writing me had an actual human head in a < jar, but it turned out to be simple confusion. < < People sometimes seem to think I have a large staff that < produces these things. It's just me, except for good people at < ibiblio who run the servers, and the people who have chipped < in with the mailing list, search engine, and mirrors. < < Some people seem to think these cartoons are produced by a < large staff, who work for me. < < Do you get any hate mail? < < Not much. Most of it is short and to the point. "You're no < Gary Larsen" is another perennial favorite. (I agree that I am < no Gary Larsen. Most of those people tend to go on quite a bit < about money, as if I was getting a lot of it.) It used to be < that all the hate mail I got invariably came from people on < WebTV, so I began to think that everybody with WebTV hated me < for some reason, and my heart sank. But I also got some nice < e-mails from WebTV people. I guess everybody on WebTV didn't < hate me, and my heart soared. I trend I've noticed lately is < that people who don't like the cartoon always send me e-mails < from bogus addresses, so I couldn't reply even if I wanted to. < (I am always curious about people who send my nasty e-mails, < and look for them on google, deja, interpol, etc.) Really < though, if people don't like the cartoon they just don't read < it, and everybody's happy. It's not like it's sitting there on < the comics page, goading them into canceling their internet < subscription. < < Speaking of hate mail, what's the deal with Doctor Fun and the < Far Side? < < I've got all those old Far Side collections, and whenever I < need more ideas, I just pull them out and start copying. < They've never caught me yet - oops! I think the Far Side is < one of the funniest things ever, and was certainly an < inspiration, but comparisons to the Far Side are a non-event. < If you draw any kind of wacky one-panel comic, and anybody < laughs at it, then somebody brings up the Far Side. You could < go through a couple years of The New Yorker, pick out all the < most Larsenesque cartoons, and create your own pseudo-Far Side < collection. It is a certain flavor of humor. Gary Larsen made < it his own, and kept it up longer and better than anybody < else. I took a cartooning class once where one of the students < drew nothing but ogres swinging decapitated babies around. The < instructor thought this was wacky stuff, and kept exclaiming < that Decapitron or whatever the guy called himself, was the < next Gary Larsen. Go figure - that was the judgement of a bona < fide New Yorker cartoonist. If you pushed me, I would say Jim < Unger was a bigger influence. I was reading Herman for years < before I ever saw the Far Side. Gary Larsen is the next Gary < Larsen, if he would ever start drawing again. < < Having said all that: Every cartoonist's fear is to open the < paper and find that they've drawn somebody else's idea. Back < when Doctor Fun was just getting started, Gary Larsen was < still drawing the Far Side. I opened the paper one day to find < a Far Side cartoon virtually identical to something I had < drawn but hadn't posted yet. (At that time, I was drawing a < pool of cartoons, and then picking from them to set up the < cartoons for each week.) I don't have the Larsen cartoon to < show you for comparison, but here's the one I had to pull. And < here's one that was a little too similar to a Mother Goose and < Grimm cartoon (same exact situation). Now I just don't read < the comics in the paper anymore. < < Here are two other cartoons I pulled, both because I thought < they were in bad taste at the time. My tastes have changed, I < just think they're too dumb to run now. < * Cartoon that was in bad taste but is now just too dumb #1 < * Cartoon that was in bad taste but is now just too dumb #2 < < At last, after all these years I've finally managed to sneak < all four of those lame duck cartoons online! < < What software and hardware do you use to draw Doctor Fun? < < Right now, Adobe Photoshop 6.0. In the past I've used Aldus < PhotoPaint, and earlier versions of Photoshop. I've tried < other software, like Fractal Design Painter, and the GIMP, but < I always go back to Photoshop. My computer right now is a Sony < LX-910 PenTablet, which I bought solely because of the drawing < table/screen combination. It works great (for drawing, and < everything else I do - as far as raw computing goes, it's not < exactly the kind of thing you'd write into MaximumPC about). < I'm willing to spend a reasonable amount of money to get the < right tools, as long as I'm actually going to use them. < < Update: Sony discontinued the entire PenTablet line. Only < loser Internet cartoonists were buying it. But if you are a < loser Internet cartoonist and missed getting your Sony < PenTablet computer on eBay, Wacom sells a similar tablet now. < < Update Update: The Sony is long gone, and has been replaced < with a teeny-tiny Fujitsu Lifebook and a Wacom Intuos. Did < anybody really notice? And now we're up to Photoshop CS2 < (9.0). < < What kind of software and hardware did you use when you < started drawing Doctor Fun? < < I had a 33 Mhz 486 with 32 Mbytes of RAM, a CalComp Wiz < drawing tablet (no pressure, and the pen was attached by a < cord - can you imagine such a thing?), and an Epson flatbed < scanner. I only used the computer to color the cartoons. I < started the cartoons as drawings on paper and scanned them < into Aldus PhotoStyler. It's been a shoestring operation, as < far as hardware goes, until recently. < < Why a Windows box? Why don't you use a Mac? < < A good question. I like Macs. They were ferociously expensive < when I first got interested in the idea of combining computers < and cartoons (long before Doctor Fun started) and since I used < Windows almost all the time at my day jobs, I decided to just < go with that. If Apple had a Mac that did what this Sony does < with the screen, I probably would have bought one this time < around. < < And the ugly truth is, political issues aside, properly < configured, Windows can work pretty well. Since my day job is < supporting Windows, I can provide myself with Kwality < Technical Support at home (except that time I installed < OS/2...) < < Why don't you used Linux or BSD and the GIMP? < < Another good question. I like the GIMP, too, but I don't see < it as being where Photoshop is right now. I keep an eye on it, < though. < < Why don't you use... < < Another great question. I like all computers, all operating < systems, and all software. It's all great! < < Now I want to send you hate mail because you use Microsoft and < Adobe products. < < Sure, whatever. < < How are the cartoons drawn in Photoshop? < < If you've ever seen cartoon animation cels for sale, and had a < chance to look at them close up, Doctor Fun isn't that much < different. There is usually a minimum of three layers, not < physical layers to the cartoon while I'm drawing it. These are < not physical layers, but rather computerized layers managed by < Photoshop, that stack on top of one another. One layer is just < the black and white drawing itself. Another layer is the < background. And the last layer is the actual coloring of the < action in the foreground. While I'm working on a cartoon, the < number of layers usually expands, as I'll want to draw things < and keep them separated until it's time to put the whole thing < together. The artwork is kept in a separate file, and I pop it < into the template and add the caption, date, and all the other < text as the last step. (The file I upload only has one layer.) < There are a number of techniques I like that I usually use on < every cartoon, and some that I only use to solve a particular < problem. Over the years I've learned that simpler is better. < Something that gives the appearance of having been worked on < for hours is sometimes the same as something that actually < took hours. < < The cartoons are 640 x 480 pixels, which is vanilla VGA < resolution. Hardly anybody runs their display at that < resolution anymore, but it's still a good default. The actual < artwork is 515 x 380 pixels. That leaves enough space around < the rest of the frame for the title, copyright notice, and a < caption. The font used in the cartoons is GillSans (and < sometimes a GillSans knock-off when I didn't have Adobe Type < Manager available). < < Some people have asked for a step-by-step explanation with < screenshots, but there's not enough time in the world for that < right now. Maybe someday. Here's a screenshot just for you < . < < Early Doctor Funs were done in Aldus PhotoStyler and didn't < use layers. I colored right over a copy of the line art, < destroying it in the process, and then pasted another copy < over top when the coloring was finished. < < According to the cartoons in the archive, I switched from < Aldus PhotoStyler to Adobe Photoshop starting August 31, 1995, < and I switched to drawing the cartoons from scratch on the < computer using a tablet (a CalComp, I think) on October 13, < 1997. < < Here, for your amusement, and at no extra charge, are some < cartoons from Ye Ancient Days, that I drew with a mouse using < DeluxePaint II Enhanced. So you know, I was working on this a < long time before 1993... < * DeluxePaint II Enhanced cartoon #1 < * DeluxePaint II Enhanced cartoon #2 < < Where do you get the backgrounds and textures that sometimes < show up in the cartoons? < < Some of the material is from clip art collections that come < with software I've purchased, some of it is from photos I've < taken myself, and some it is created wholly from scratch. I'm < a sucker for those "2000 Textures for $2.95!" CD-ROMs you see < in OfficeDepot. Whatever works. If I'm spending a lot of time < on the background and textures, then I am probably spending < too much time. < < How long does it take to draw a Doctor Fun? < < I do them in batches by working on the drawings themselves, < and then picking out a batch that I'll work on for specific < dates. And then creating the backgrounds for each cartoon, and < then doing the coloring of the foreground parts of the < cartoon. The coloring part takes the longest. If I did each < one one-by-one (which is how I did them when I started), it < would take much longer. If you absolutely must have a number, < I'd say each cartoon takes about an hour to an hour and a < half. < < Why don't you draw the cartoons in higher resolution? < < 640 x 480 is the lowest common denominator, and some people < still run their screens at that resolution, believe it or not. < If you are running your display at a lower resolution, the < cartoon will appear bigger. If you are running your display at < a higher resolution, the cartoon will appear smaller. I think < Doctor Fun looks fine both ways. (I run my display at work at < 1280x1024, not that I'm ever looking at cartoons at work.) I'd < also like consistency through the entire run of the cartoon, < however long that might be. < < Also, the computer I mentioned above that I'm using with the < drawing tablet built into the screen runs at a maximum < resolution of 1024 x 768 pixels. Although I've run other < computers with a separate tablet and display at higher < resolutions, I get the best response on the Sony working on < pictures at a 1:1 ratio. So, in order to keep all the other < palettes and stuff on the screen, the smaller image size still < works well. I'm aware that other cartoonists don't work this < way, and all way-cool people use vectors and fancy-fancy < stuff, but Doctor Fun is more doodlely-oodly than all that. < < For people who want some high resolution, here's a really big < logo. < < What other software do you use besides Adobe Photoshop? < < I use Cerious Software's ThumbsPlus for browsing and doing < various handy things to images. < < I use Paul Lutus's Arachnophilia for editing my web pages (and < emacs, poorly, if I happen to need to edit stuff at the unix < prompt). < < I usually use Ed Hamrick's excellent Vuescan for scanning < stuff. < < Why JPEG for the Doctor Fun cartoons? < < It's the least worst situation. GIF throws out too much color < information (and there's that whole proprietary format thing). < PNG in 24-bit color is not small enough, and PNG support is < still iffy. The drawback with JPEG is that it futzes up some < of the line art and text, but I'll put up with that to keep it < in 24-bit color. I know there are other technologies, I've < even experimented with them, but nothing is as universal as < JPEG. < < The master copies of all the files I keep are mostly PNG. < < How have the drawings changed over the years? < < I spent a lot of time looking at the older cartoons during my < long break and decided that the major problem with many of < them was that they were overdone and hard to read. The focus < of cartoons didn't stand out well enough from the backgrounds, < and many of them used all sorts of silly effects that didn't < add anything to the joke. All that aside, Doctor Fun has a < certain "look" to it that was something more than pen and ink. < So I decided to make a real effort to keep all the colorful < stuff, but also keep the focus on the joke. So the backgrounds < are now usually blown out and faded in order to make the line < art stand out, and I go easier on the fancy effects. < < On the other hand, like most cartoonists, I'm hypercritical < about my own work and would probably pull most of it off if I < wasn't self-aware enough to keep a lid on it. I drew cartoons < for years and threw them in a drawer (or only showed them to a < couple friends) because I didn't think they were any good. < There hasn't been any time when I've been drawing Doctor Fun < that I didn't think I was doing the best I could do with what < I had available. My tastes have changed, though. < < Drawing the cartoons has gotten faster, and actually more fun < now that I've eliminated the hand/eye coordination thing with < a separate tablet and monitor, and I'm drawing right on the < screen. A lot of people have trouble learning to draw with a < tablet while looking at a monitor. It took me a long time of < trying until I felt I was drawing good enough to stop using < paper. Now that I can draw on the screen, I'm happy to forget < all about that. < < Where do you get your ideas? < < I don't know how many other cartoonists work. My methods may < be unprofessional. I keep a little notebook, and try to sit < quietly in a corner somewhere every day for a couple minutes < and jot some ideas down. I try to read as much as I can find < the time - mostly on the Internet while I'm supposed to be < working. When it's time to draw some cartoons, I go through my < notebook and pick out what still sounds funny and possibly < easy to draw. Where do the ideas actually come from? Who < really knows. That's the answer that annoys the people who ask < this questions. I can say that my ideas always pop into my < head fully-formed, the drawing, and the punch line together. < Most ideas come from something I've read, or something I saw, < or something - they don't just come from nowhere. I've been < working this way ever since I started. < < Why are there some recurring themes in Doctor Fun? < < I've been told that sea cucumbers, heads in jars, and bums in < alleys are some of many recurring themes. I think people think < I work these themes more often than I actually do. If I had to < pick a theme, I'd say chickens and squirrels have popped up a < lot, and peeps at Easter. < < Are you buying or using ideas for Doctor Fun? < < Not interested. Writing the cartoon is half the fun for me. < < If you have ideas for cartoons, check out a copy of "The < Writers Market" - they may have listings for people who want < to buy your cartoon ideas. Or draw a cartoon yourself. Even if < you don't draw, you can always try. And if you keep drawing, < you'll get better. < < I'm sending you these ideas anyway. You don't even have to pay < me if you use them. We can be collaborators. All that I ask < is... < < [DEL: Go the fuck away! :DEL] No, thanks. < < I didn't understand Doctor Fun today. Whatever shall I do? < < You can always e-mail me. It's no trouble for me to explain my < cartoons since I drew them, and I'm not all famous and full of < myself yet. But if you'd rather have a bunch of other people < explain Doctor Fun, you can also send the cartoon into Bill < Bickel's "Comics I Don't Understand Page" and let other people < explain the cartoon for you. Bill's got some weird thing going < where he doesn't think it's proper to let the actual < cartoonist explain their cartoons, so you won't see me there < (but I do read it). < < Do you make any money from Doctor Fun? < < I sometimes get small fees when people want to reprint one of < my cartoons. I got a small advance when I was associated with < United Media, which they screamed bloody murder about. That's < about it. < < Are you a professional cartoonist? Do you want to make money < from Doctor Fun? < < I was once going to be interviewed via e-mail for some high < school newspaper, but after a couple preliminary questions, < they decided I wasn't really a cartoonist, and they had to < find somebody else. < < A tough question. I used to say yes. Then, for awhile, I said < no. But now I say yes again. For situations where any other < cartoonist would be asking a fee, I ask for one, too. First of < all, I like getting money. Second of all, I don't want to horn < in on the territory of people who work hard drawing cartoons < for a living by giving away freebies. (I work hard drawing < these cartoons, too.) So when I deal in situations where a < professional cartoonist would expect money for something, I < ask for the same fees, including reprint fees for Doctor Fun < where any other cartoonist would charge money. Most of the < time this results in no money, but what the heck. < < I go around and around trying to explain to people sometimes < how, yes, I think money could be made off of Doctor Fun, but < no, it has not really made any money to date, and no, I'm not < going to bag the way it's done now in hopes of making money < later. So when people have come to me with their ideas since < the United Media debacle, my take on it has been, what's in it < for me? Usually there isn't much in it at all, except a chance < "to get my cartoons published" (they are already published) or < a chance to drop everything I'm doing now to do things the way < someone else thinks I should do it. I still haven't found what < I'm looking for. I sometimes find myself in conversation with < people who believe that by making money I'll somehow validate < what I'm doing, which seems to me the best argument in the < world to keep doing things the way I'm doing them. I do have a < real job, after all. I'm not interested in being a cartoon < star. < < Do you ever do other work on the web? < < If it's worth my time, sure. I used get offers to do quite a < bit of work, usually for good money, right after I started < Doctor Fun. Much of the work had nothing to do with < cartooning, so I would usually just do the stuff that seemed < related to what I was already doing. I think I got this work < only because Doctor Fun was popping up whenever people tried < to do a search for anything related to web graphics. The < situation has changed since 1993. < < What's the story with Doctor Fun and United Media? < < Doctor Fun was licensed to United Media for slightly less than < a year starting in May, 1995. < < I still haven't figured out what the deal was with United < Media. The kindest thing I can say about the experience was < that United Media decided to jump into the Internet without < really knowing what they wanted to do, wanted some cool < Internet stuff, and I was handy. Once they found that they < could do quite well with the cartoons they already syndicated < to newspapers, my association with them was pretty pointless, < since they didn't plan to take Doctor Fun into print, and the < couple thousand readers I brought in really didn't stack up to < much compared to how many people read even their most obscure < features in the papers. I am speculating, I never got a < straight answer from anybody United Media about why they acted < the way they did, and sometimes got answers from the same < person in the same conversation that were completely < contradictory. United Media never did anything with Doctor < Fun. A year went by and UM dawdled on even moving the daily < cartoon over to their web server (I had a page at United < Media, but there was never anything there except the logo and < a cartoon that was usually out of date by weeks, sometimes < months). I finally opted out of my contract and decided to < continue with things on ibiblio (which was then called < SunSITE). In fact, the cartoon never moved off of SunSITE the < whole time I was with United Media - we had an agreement that < it would stay there until they were updating it on their web < page. The whole thing was like some kind of weird bad dream. < < Having learned nothing, I later had a short association with < Tribune Media Services. I think it lasted until they actually < looked at the cartoons. < < Have you ever been published? < < In the 80s I worked really hard at getting my cartoons into < magazines, and was moderately successful. My two biggest < customers were the unlikely combination of "Spy" magazine and < "Campus Life". "Campus Life" still prints some Doctor Funs < every now and then (the ones that are appropriate for "Campus < Life"). I've had some stuff appear in King Features "The New < Breed", and at least one in "Punch" (right before they < folded). I did some ghost writing for another strip, but < didn't find it to be particularly fun. < < Spy didn't publish cartoons. < < They published mine. I'll scan them and put them up here < someday. They still owe me $200. < < Were they those cartoons that were all drawn with dots? < < No. That was Drew Friedman. < < Have you ever sent stuff to The New Yorker? < < Sure. Everybody sends stuff to The New Yorker, but it's the < biggest joke in the world because they only publish cartoons < of maybe, 20 cartoonists, who have all been drawing for them < for decades. Since everybody gets the same little yellow slip < back, it becomes a big deal just to get some indication that < some living person even looked at your cartoons. I once got a < note from Lee Lorenz on the rejection slip that said "Sorry" < and felt truly blessed. < < Who are you? < < I grew up in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. I graduated from Carlisle < High School in 1981. I attended Case Western Reserve < University in Cleveland for two years, studying engineering, < and then transferred to Millersville University in < Pennsylvania, graduating with a degree in music. I studied < pipe organ but I don't play anymore. I had no talent for < engineering or music, but somehow managed to finish the music < degree. I moved to New York City, discovered that knowing < something about personal computers made me employable, and did < all sorts of interesting and not-so-interesting jobs for < awhile while I drew cartoons and tried to sell them. I worked < in the World Trade Center for two years, and then did the temp < thing for a couple years. About ten years ago I moved to < Chicago, and have been here ever since. I used to be married. < < My parents were teachers (now retired) and still live in < Pennsylvania, although they are no longer in Carlisle. I have < one sister, one brother, and two nieces. Aren't they cute? My < sister is an engineer and my brother is a writer. I don't < personally have a dog, but between everybody else we have five < dogs, unless my sister's dogs ran away again. < < Did you study art or writing? < < Not really - I have no qualifications to draw or write, and < should probably stop. I took some painting classes when I was < in high school. I took some drawing and design courses in < college. I took a cartooning course at Parsons School of < Design when I was living in New York and some writing courses < at The New School. (I had ambitions of getting into stand-up < comedy at one time, but as soon as I got into it, I decided to < get back out of it.) I took a sculpture class a couple years < ago in Chicago. Any art instruction I've had has been pretty < random and sporadic. < < Sometimes I've done art-like stuff on the computer to practice < techniques. Here's a series of manipulations I did to a photo < (of me!) many years ago using Aldus PhotoStyler. < < If that didn't grab you, here's a study in bad compositing. < < Here's another image. The trick here is that all the effects < you see in the image were generated from the black and white < image of the skull. Now that's tricky! < < These days, if I think of something arty, it goes into the < cartoon or (more likely) the logo. < < What cartoons did you read when you were little? < < Now comes the tiresome list of sophisticated or < cool-in-a-postmodern-ironic-way cartoons that cartoonists < always say they read when they were little. Other than Herman < (see above) lots of Pogo and Peanuts. I never saw either < actually as a strip in the newspaper, so I only read them in < books. Pogo was the best because I read the books and liked < them when I was little just because of the way it was drawn < and how the characters talked, and then when I was older I < read them again and suddenly understood all the political < stuff that went over my head when I was younger. Some other < comics I remember reading over and over were the Carl Bark's < Scrooge McDuck adventures (particularly the one where they get < lost in the asteroid belt), Toonerville Trolley, and Classics < Illustrated. I never much got into superhero type comic books. < Notice not much of this is anything like Doctor Fun, is it? < Two that I liked that maybe do have a connection are Herman < and Hatlo's They'll Do It Everytime. For awhile I liked < political cartoons more than anything else. And, I would go < through anything that had panel cartoons, New Yorker, National < Lampoon, Punch, etc. I read lots of other stuff that wasn't < cartoons, and I had a ViewMaster, too. < < I don't spend much time looking at other cartoons these days. < I do sometimes look at this one, and this one. < < Are you really a doctor? < < I'm not a doctor of any sort. Nor am I Doctor Fun. < < What do you do for a living? < < I work for the University of Chicago Library. I manage the < desktop support group, officially known as Administrative and < Desktop Systems. I've been at the library for almost ten < years. It's a great job working with nice people (who might < read this). < < What else do you do? < < I like to run. Here are some races I did. I've done many more, < but these are the only ones I have pictures of. I also run < with the Lincoln Park Pacers. Join us for a run if you're in < Chicago and you run. < < When did you start drawing cartoons? < < I started drawing the kinds of cartoons I draw now back in the < summer of 1984. True but tedious story: I was taking summer < courses at Millersville, and got stuck in principles of < accounting at 7:30 in the morning. Death. Even the BigGulp < coffee from 7-11 didn't help. I doodled little cartoony < pictures to stay awake. Ok, to be fair, I always doodled < little cartoony pictures, but this was doodling with a grim < purpose. One day I realized that something I'd doodled was a < cartoon with a joke and everything, just like real cartoons. < (I have that cartoon somewhere - when I find it I'll scan it < in.) I had never occurred to me before that I could do that. I < wondered if I could draw more "real" cartoons so I tried to < think up some ideas. I thought of lots of ideas - doodled a < bunch of them down, and then showed them to some of my friends < a couple days later back home. They all laughed, so I kept < drawing and started sending them off to magazines. The < magazine editors weren't as easily entertained as my friends, < but I kept drawing, and eventually sold some. < < I also drew some comic strip-type cartoons in high school < mostly involving the supposed adventures of certain people we < all knew, but these were juvenile and poorly-drawn and not at < all worth further mention here. (I have those cartoons < somewhere, too, but they are not getting scanned in.) < < Why do you draw Doctor Fun? < < People read it, so I keep drawing it. I always think it could < be better, and maybe someday I'll get it right. For years, I < drew cartoons and threw them in a drawer, and nobody ever read < them. Or I sent them to magazines, and most of them got sent < back. So this is an improvement. When I started drawing Doctor < Fun, it was a bigger deal to create a cartoon on a computer < than it is now. < < Why did you take a long break in 1998? < < I was getting divorced. It was an unpleasant time, and I < finally decided to take a break for the duration. I'm only < explaining this because concerned people have written to me < thinking I was ill, or had some other crisis. (But thanks for < your concern, those who wrote.) It may have been a mistake to < keep the cartoon dark for so long - I'm still getting e-mails < from people who didn't know it was running again. I could have < started Doctor Fun back up again sooner than I did. By the < time all the bad stuff was over, I was working on a < semi-mindless project I knew would never get done (scanning < all my old cartoons) if I started drawing Doctor Fun again, so < I decided to put it off until I was all done with that. My < ex-wife drew this chipmunk which used to be on the old faq < page. < < When will Doctor Fun end? < < I hope to be allowed to continue Doctor Fun after the < superintelligent robots have taken over and made us all their < slaves. < < Hopefully before I go crazy or get run over by a bus, or go < crazy and get run over by a bus, or get run over by a bus, and < then go crazy, or... I would like it not to end, but I don't < know. It's not a career right now, and circumstances can < change. It could turn into something else. It could turn into < a career. It's what I'm doing now. If it continues the way it < is, I'd like to draw ten year's worth of Doctor Fun, meaning < 520 weeks. Even if I take some breaks, the goal is 520 weeks < of Doctor Fun. You can see where I am now if you look at the < files in the archive page. There is a long way to go, but < we're more than halfway there. So, what happens after 520 < weeks? I will probably take a break and think about what I < want to do next. I'll be in my forties. There's a thing out < there somewhere called a social life. Of course, what I'll < probably do if I make it that far, is just keep going, because < there will be nothing else for me to do. < < One possibility I've considered for post-520 weeks is to < continue Doctor Fun as a black-and-white daily, and have a < color cartoon every weekend. --- > Doctor Fun is over. As promised, I somehow managed to finish > 520 weeks or ten full years, even if it took a bit longer than > ten years to get there. All of the old cartoons will stay > right here as long as ibiblio wants to keep hosting them. And, > of course, Doctor Fun would never have been possible without > the good people of ibiblio. I still have some old pre-Doctor > Fun cartoons to add to the archive, so there's a bit more to > come. And perhaps there will be something new here in the > future. > > Sometime in the near future I will post a new FAQ and some > thoughts about Doctor Fun. In the meantime, as always, thanks > reading Doctor Fun. > > Here are some Doctor-Fun related links that may still be of > interest. > Browse Doctor Fun cartoons and logos all the way back to 1993 > in The Doctor Fun Archive. > Search Doctor Fun Captions: Mark Plaga's Doctor Fun Search > Page, Jack Leblond's Doctor Fun Search Page > Random Doctor Fun? > Doctor Fun Mirrors: Pacific Internet, Australia, Austria, > Great Britain > If you are a programmer-type person, you can get Doctor Fun > and zillions of other comics with Netcomics. > Find out when these pages update, with Jonathan Ah Kit's > Doctor Fun Website Changes List. > Some Old Week of Doctor Fun, Mostafa Eldefrawy's Toonogram, > Doctor Fun Segmation > Lots of old, pre-Internet Doctor Fun stuff, including Science > Fair, and other interesting things. Readers often pick this > one. 1360,1361d38 < There you go. That's the story, at least as I remember it. < David 1363c40,41 < Back to Doctor Fun --- > These pages maintained, and contents copyrighted, by David > Farley, [email protected] 1365c43 < [email protected] --- > Back to the top --===============0863195435== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dr-fun-changes mailing list http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/dr-fun-changes http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/ http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/books.htm http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/faq.html http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/book-faq.html Note: Links aren't included in the diff. --===============0863195435==--