Inanimate Objects
Dave Monroe <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Jun 2002 02:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.thomas-pynchon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Inanimate things could do what they wanted. Not what they wanted because things do not want; only men. But things do what they do ..." (V., Ch. 1, p. 26) Et alia ... From Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. I, "The Process of Production of Capital," Pt. I, "Commodities and Money," Ch. 1, "Commodities," Sec. 4, "The Fetishism of Commodities and the Secret Thereof," trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling (1887 [1867]) ... "There is a physical relation between physical things. But it is different with commodities. There, the existence of the things qua commodities, and the value-relation between the products of labour which stamps them as commodities, have absolutely no connexion with their physical properties and with the material relations arising therefrom. There it is a definite social relation between men, that assumes, in their eyes, the fantastic form of a relation between things. In order, therefore, to find an analogy, we must have recourse to the mist-enveloped regions of the religious world. In that world the productions of the human brain appear as independent beings endowed with life, and entering into relation both with one another and the human race. So it is in the world of commodities with the products of men's hands. This I call the Fetishism which attaches itself to the products of labour, so soon as they are produced as commodities, and which is therefore inseparable from the production of commodities." http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch01.htm http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com