Clogging our courts? A warped perspective on things
David Farber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.people.interesting-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Begin forwarded message: From: Richard Forno <[email protected]> Date: September 29, 2006 9:29:39 AM EDT To: Infowarrior List <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Farber <[email protected]> Subject: Clogging our courts? A warped perspective on things Interesting difference of what "clogging our courts" means these days: ``Detainees from Guantanamo have clogged our courts with more than 420 lawsuits challenging everything from their access to the Internet to the quality of their recreation facilities," her office said in a statement that called the lawsuits ``an abuse of our court system." http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/09/28/ legal_resid ents_rights_curbed_in_detainee_bill?mode=PF) ..but it's obviously okay to "clog the courts" with lawsuits over music and movie downloading, and this isn't "abusing" our court system: "The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) announced that the major Hollywood motion picture studios would be filing hundreds of lawsuits against individuals using peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing software to access movies online. In so doing, Hollywood follows in the footsteps of the music industry, which has filed more than 6,000 lawsuits against file sharers since September 2003." http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MPAA_v_ThePeople/ Interesting. -rf