more on Dynamic IP address confusion results in wrong family raided

Begin forwarded message:

From: Matt Blaze <[email protected]>
Date: October 26, 2006 11:36:22 AM EDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IP] Dynamic IP address confusion results in wrong  
family raided

Matching dynamic IP addresses to subscribers is a very hard problem
for a third-party eavesdropper such as a law enforcement wiretap.
Steve Bellovin and I talked about some of the risks associated with
this in the context of the FBI's (subsequently renamed) "Carnivore"
system back in 2000:

     http://www.crypto.com/papers/opentap.html

More recently, some of my graduate students and I have been looking
at the more general problem of reliably wiretapping Internet
traffic.  Ironically, although the Internet often makes it relatively
easy to for a third party to intercept traffic, the protocols,
architecture and software can make it difficult for an eavesdropper
to recover accurately the content and origin of that traffic.  Worse,
many interception schemes make it relatively easy for a third party
to frame someone by injecting incriminating- looking traffic that was
never actually part of any exchange. See:

     http://www.crypto.com/papers/internet-tap.pdf

Unfortunately, Internet-based evidence is often accepted uncritically
by the legal system, and the associated risks are not well understood.
In fact, collecting "high fidelity" transcripts of Internet activity
may be very hard, and CALEA-like wiretapping capability mandates on
the Internet are likely to be very difficult (and expensive) to
implement properly (and may actually make the problem of unreliable
evidence significantly worse, since many of the points at which these
interfaces would have to be implemented will not be in a position to
extract all the context required for an accurate reconstruction).

-matt


On Oct 25, 2006, at 19:41, David Farber wrote:

>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Lauren Weinstein <[email protected]>
> Date: October 25, 2006 6:48:18 PM EDT
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Dynamic IP address confusion results in wrong family raided
>
>
> Dave,
>
> This story should raise the red flag for virtually all Internet users,
> since everyone is at risk for this sort of potentially serious
> misadventure:
>
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061024-8062.html
>
> When an armed porn raid took place *at the wrong physical address*
> apparently based solely on ISP information derived from an IP
> address, the results could have been deadly.  It appears that a
> dynamic IP address was incorrectly mapped to a subscriber.
>
> We've seen cases before where apparently nonsensical raids have been
> conducted for the MPAA based on IP addresses that may well have been
> incorrect.
>
> This isn't funny anymore, if it ever was.  ISPs, search engines, and
> other sources of retained Internet user activity data are being
> treated as adjuncts of law enforcement, with the incredibly
> dangerous and faulty presumption that such data will always be
> accurate and reliable.
>
> In these kinds of situations, such errors involving retained data
> could get people killed.
>
> --Lauren--
> Lauren Weinstein
> [email protected] or [email protected]
> Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
> http://www.pfir.org/lauren
> Co-Founder, PFIR
>    - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
> Co-Founder, IOIC
>    - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net
> Co-Founder, CIFIP
>    - California Initiative For Internet Privacy - http://www.cifip.org
> Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
> Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
> Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
> DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------
> You are subscribed as [email protected]
> To manage your subscription, go to
>  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
>
> Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- 
> people/