more on eVoting thoughts
David Farber <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:04:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.people.interesting-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Begin forwarded message: From: Ben Combee <[email protected]> Date: November 8, 2006 10:54:09 AM EST To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IP] eVoting thoughts On 11/7/06, Peter Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > First - no feedback. Was my vote counted? No indication at all. In > the old voting machines, the curtain would open when you moved the > handle, and at least that provided *some* indication that something > was > going on. In these new systems, at least the one I used, there is > absolutely no feedback. The quiet is eerie. > > Second - who did I vote for? There's no indication that the > candidates > I voted for were the ones the machine registered. It's just stupid > not > to have some indication of this. Normal interactive procedure is to > provide confirmation of your choices *before* you complete an > interactive task. Apparently the designers felt that the light beside > your candidate was enough feedback. Call me stoopid, but it sure left > me wondering. The e-Slate system we used here in Austin, Texas addressed both of these: After going through the entire ballot, you get a summary screen listing all of your votes, and you can scroll through the list and return to any race and change your choice. There's a separate "Cast Ballot" button on the box, and when you hit the button, the screen changes to one of a waving American flag which indicates that your ballot has been registered in both the memory on the device and on the "Judge Ballot Controller" that is connected to each machine.