Smithsonian says move on, get over it. (fwd)

Begin forwarded message:

From: Carl Malamud <[email protected]>
Date: November 18, 2006 9:07:10 AM EST
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Smithson] Smithsonian says move on, get over it. (fwd)

Hi Dave -

For IP, if you wish.

Regards,

Carl


From: Carl Malamud <[email protected]>
Date: November 18, 2006 9:00:11 AM EST
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Smithson] Smithsonian says move on, get over it.


Hi -

The Smithsonian Institution has been telling Congress and the public
to move on and get over it.  This note summarizes the situation and
contains a "call for action" in the form of a letter to Congress.
Feel free to forward.

Smithsonian lobbyists are trying to paper over their exclusive 30-year
sellout to Showtime, saying that the contract has posed no problems
and nobody seems to be upset about it anymore.

This position is meant to convince Congress that they should rescind
language in pending House bills, such as provisions that no contracts
shall be issued that limit access by the public.  The situation is
timely since the House and Senate will soon be meeting to reconcile
bills in conference.

This situation just begs for a little sunshine, but that's the last
thing the Smithsonian seems to want:

     o The contract is still secret and was even withheld at first
       from members of Congress.  When they finally delivered the
       document to the oversight committee, large portions of the
       contract were redacted until they agreed to sign an NDA.
       The public *still* hasn't seen this contract.

     o The Smithsonian managed to get the hearing record pulled from
       the Government Printing Office web site, claiming it contained
       sensitive material, but I snagged a copy before it was pulled

       http://public.resource.org/smithsonian_hearing.pdf
         (3.4 mbyte pdf file)

       Appendix 3 contains a small excerpt from the contract, which
       is why that had it pulled.

     o The Government Accounting Office has delivered a draft report
       of the contract to the Congress and Smithsonian officials  
maintain
       the study should not be released for the public to see.

If you don't want this situation simply brushed under the Smithsonian's
rug, please read and consider signing this letter to members of  
Congress:

	http://public.resource.org/smithsonian_congress.html

I'll be taking signatures through Sunday, November 25 and will deliver
the letter the following week.  Your help would be much appreciated!

Best Regards,

Carl Malamud

===================
Archival Materials:

         http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/04/b1554385.html

BoingBoing posts on this topic:

- April 4, 2006: Smithsonian becomes Showtime's exclusive first- 
refusal archive
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/04/smithsonian_becomes_.html

- April 5, 2006: Smithsonian's Showtime sellout needs FOIA sunshine
  http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/05/smithsonians_showtim.html

- April 7, 2006: Smithsonian's Showtime deal: critical attorneys  
shred it
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/07/smithsonians_showtim.html

- April 17, 2006: Hundreds ask Smithsonian not to sell out to Showtime
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/17/hundreds_ask_smithso.html

- April 29, 2006: Smithsonian's sellout to Showtime slammed by Congress
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/29/smithsonians_sellout.html

- May 4, 2006: Lawmakers slap Smithsonian over Showtime sellout deal
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/04/lawmakers_slap_smith.html
_______________________________________________
Smithson mailing list
[email protected]